TY - JOUR
T1 - Labor neuraxial analgesia and breastfeeding
T2 - An updated systematic review
AU - Heesen, Philip
AU - Halpern, Stephen H.
AU - Beilin, Yaakov
AU - Mauri, Paola A.
AU - Eidelman, Leonid A.
AU - Heesen, Michael
AU - Orbach-Zinger, Sharon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Introduction: There have been numerous reports studying the effect of neuraxial analgesia on breastfeeding success, but the results are inconsistent. Methods: We performed a literature search in various databases for studies comparing neuraxial analgesia to non-neuraxial or no analgesia. Outcomes were the percentage of women breastfeeding fully or mixed with formula. Where possible, nulliparous parturients were analyzed separately. We conducted an analysis excluding studies of serious and critical risk of bias. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: We included 15 studies (13 observational studies, 1 secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 1 case-control study) with 16,112 participants. Overall, there were 6 studies that found no difference between groups, 6 studies that showed a significantly lower incidence of breastfeeding in the neuraxial group and 3 studies finding mixed results (at some time-points statistically significant and at some time-point statistically non-significant results). In nulliparous only studies, 2 found no difference between study groups, 1 found a lower breastfeeding rate in the neuraxial group and 3 studies showed mixed results. Excluding studies with a serious and critical risk of bias, 1 study found no difference between study groups, 3 studies found a decrease of breastfeeding rates in the neuraxial group, and 1 study showed mixed results. Discussion: In our review we found a high disparity in results. One reason is probably the high potential of confounding (immediate skin to skin placement, maternity leave etc.). Education programs and breastfeeding support are likely more important in determining long term breastfeeding success.
AB - Introduction: There have been numerous reports studying the effect of neuraxial analgesia on breastfeeding success, but the results are inconsistent. Methods: We performed a literature search in various databases for studies comparing neuraxial analgesia to non-neuraxial or no analgesia. Outcomes were the percentage of women breastfeeding fully or mixed with formula. Where possible, nulliparous parturients were analyzed separately. We conducted an analysis excluding studies of serious and critical risk of bias. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Results: We included 15 studies (13 observational studies, 1 secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, 1 case-control study) with 16,112 participants. Overall, there were 6 studies that found no difference between groups, 6 studies that showed a significantly lower incidence of breastfeeding in the neuraxial group and 3 studies finding mixed results (at some time-points statistically significant and at some time-point statistically non-significant results). In nulliparous only studies, 2 found no difference between study groups, 1 found a lower breastfeeding rate in the neuraxial group and 3 studies showed mixed results. Excluding studies with a serious and critical risk of bias, 1 study found no difference between study groups, 3 studies found a decrease of breastfeeding rates in the neuraxial group, and 1 study showed mixed results. Discussion: In our review we found a high disparity in results. One reason is probably the high potential of confounding (immediate skin to skin placement, maternity leave etc.). Education programs and breastfeeding support are likely more important in determining long term breastfeeding success.
KW - Breastfeeding
KW - Epidural analgesia
KW - Lactation
KW - Neuraxial analgesia
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092490034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110105
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110105
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33069970
AN - SCOPUS:85092490034
SN - 0952-8180
VL - 68
JO - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
JF - Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
M1 - 110105
ER -