Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kidney Transplantation From Hepatitis C Virus–Infected Donors to Uninfected Recipients: A Systematic Review for the KDIGO 2022 Hepatitis C Clinical Practice Guideline Update

  • Craig E. Gordon
  • , Gaelen P. Adam
  • , Michel Jadoul
  • , Paul Martin
  • , Ethan M. Balk

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has made transplantation of kidneys from HCV-infected donors to uninfected recipients (D+/R−) feasible. To facilitate an update to the 2018 KDIGO guideline for patients with CKD and HCV, we conducted a systematic review of HCV D+/R− kidney transplantation coupled with DAA treatment. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting & Study Populations: We included studies of HCV D+/R− kidney transplantations that used any DAA protocol. Selection Criteria for Studies: Based on a search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 1, 2022, conferences from 2019 to 2021, and the 2018 KDIGO HCV guideline we identified single-group (D+/R−) or comparative studies of D+/R− versus D−/R− kidney transplantation. Data extraction: Conducted in SRDR-Plus with review by a second researcher. Analytical Approach: Maximum likelihood meta-analyses; the certainty of evidence was assessed per GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Results: We identified 16 studies (N = 557). A sustained viral response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was observed in 97.7% (95% CI, 96.3%-98.8%). Ultrashort duration treatment (≤8 days) resulted in viremia requiring standard-course DAA treatment in some patients, all of whom achieved SVR12 after 1 or rarely 2 DAA courses. Serious adverse events from DAA treatment were rare after D+/R− transplantation (0.4% [95% CI, 0.1%-2.8%]). At ≥1 year after D+/R− transplantation, recipient death occurred in 2.1% (95% CI, 0.9-3.7) and allograft survival was 97.6% (95% CI, 95.7%-98.9%). Estimated glomerular filtration rate 1 year after transplantation ranged from 46 to 74 mL/min/1.73 m2. Limitations: Analyses were generally based on low-certainty evidence. Uncertainty exists about the long-term safety and efficacy of D+/R− transplantation. Few studies investigated ultrashort treatment courses. Conclusions: Kidney transplantation from HCV-infected donors to uninfected recipients followed by DAA treatment appears to be safe and associated with excellent 1-year clinical outcomes. Plain-Language Summary: Due to the high efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), the use of kidneys from HCV-infected deceased donors may increase rates of kidney transplantation. We conducted a systematic review for the 2022 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on Hepatitis C to evaluate the safety and efficacy of kidney transplantation from HCV-infected donors to uninfected recipients (D+/R−) followed by DAA therapy. Sixteen studies comprising 557 patients revealed high rates of sustained viral response, low rates of adverse events, and excellent patient and allograft survival 1 year after transplantation. Kidney transplantation from HCV-infected deceased donors to uninfected recipients treated with DAA appears safe and effective. Future studies should investigate shorter treatment durations, monitor safety, and obtain longer-term efficacy data.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-418
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • direct-acting antivirals
  • hepatitis C
  • kidney transplantation systematic review
  • meta-analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kidney Transplantation From Hepatitis C Virus–Infected Donors to Uninfected Recipients: A Systematic Review for the KDIGO 2022 Hepatitis C Clinical Practice Guideline Update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this