Abstract
Background: Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy. Objective: To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy. Design: We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure. Setting: A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. Main Outcome Measurements: The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice. Results: Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P =.01) and <10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P =.01). Limitations: Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%). Conclusion: Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. (Clinical trial registration number: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 641-648.e8 |
Journal | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
Volume | 75 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2012 |