Abstract
We reviewed the stability of the diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). A Medline search found eight studies reiterating a diagnostic assessment for PDD-NOS. The pooled group included 322 autistic disorder (AD) and 122 PDDNOS cases. We used percentage of individuals with same diagnose at Times 1 and 2 as response criterion. The pooled Relative Risk was 1.95 (p < 0.001) showing that AD diagnostic stability was higher than PDD-NOS. When diagnosed before 36 months PDD-NOS bore a 3-year stability rate of 35%. Examining the developmental trajectories showed that PDD-NOS corresponded to a group of heterogeneous pathological conditions including prodromic forms of later AD, remitted or less severe forms of AD, and developmental delays in interaction and communication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1267-1276 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Autism
- Autistic disorder
- Diagnosis
- Meta-analysis
- Pervasive developmental disorder
- Validity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified less stable than autistic disorder? A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver