Is pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified less stable than autistic disorder? A meta-analysis

Emélie Rondeau, Leslie S. Klein, André Masse, Nicolas Bodeau, David Cohen, Jean Marc Guile

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

We reviewed the stability of the diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS). A Medline search found eight studies reiterating a diagnostic assessment for PDD-NOS. The pooled group included 322 autistic disorder (AD) and 122 PDDNOS cases. We used percentage of individuals with same diagnose at Times 1 and 2 as response criterion. The pooled Relative Risk was 1.95 (p < 0.001) showing that AD diagnostic stability was higher than PDD-NOS. When diagnosed before 36 months PDD-NOS bore a 3-year stability rate of 35%. Examining the developmental trajectories showed that PDD-NOS corresponded to a group of heterogeneous pathological conditions including prodromic forms of later AD, remitted or less severe forms of AD, and developmental delays in interaction and communication.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1267-1276
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Volume41
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Autism
  • Autistic disorder
  • Diagnosis
  • Meta-analysis
  • Pervasive developmental disorder
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified less stable than autistic disorder? A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this