Is microbubble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma?

R. Vilana, L. Bianchi, M. Varela, C. Nicolau, M. Sánchez, C. Ayuso, M. García, M. Sala, J. M. Llovet, J. Bruix, C. Bru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

87 Scopus citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with SonoVueR to evaluate the response to percutaneous treatment (ethanol injection/ radiofrequency) of hepatocellular carcinoma in comparison with spiral computed tomography (CT) immediately and 1 month after treatment. Forty-one consecutive cirrhotic patients with early stage tumor (not suitable for resection) were included. Spiral CT and CEUS were performed in all patients before treatment, in the following 24 h, and 1 month later. The results of each examination were compared with the 1-month spiral CT, considered the gold standard technique. The 24-h CEUS and the 24-h spiral CT sensitivity to detect residual disease were 27% and 20%, respectively. The 24-h CEUS and the 24-h spiral CT positive predictive value of persistent vascularization detection were 75% and 66%, respectively. The 1-month CEUS detected partial responses in ten out of 11 cases (91% sensitivity, 97% specificity, 95% accuracy). Spiral CT and CEUS performed in the 24 h following treatment are slightly useful to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. The 1-month CEUS has a high diagnostic accuracy compared with spiral -CT in the usual assessment of percutaneous treatment response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2454-2462
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume16
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Contrast-enhanced ultrasound
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Percutaneous ethanol injection
  • Radiofrequency 3ablation
  • Spiral CT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is microbubble-enhanced ultrasonography sufficient for assessment of response to percutaneous treatment in patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this