Iron dosing in kidney disease: Inconsistency of evidence and clinical practice

Adam E. Gaweda, Yelena Z. Ginzburg, Yossi Chait, Michael J. Germain, George R. Aronoff, Eliezer Rachmilewitz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

The management of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is difficult. The availability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) has increased treatment options for previously transfusion-requiring patients, but the recent evidence of ESA side effects has prompted the search for complementary or alternative approaches. Next to ESA, parenteral iron supplementation is the second main form of anemia treatment. However, as of now, no systematic approach has been proposed to balance the concurrent administration of both agents according to individual patient's needs. Furthermore, the potential risks of excessive iron dosing remain a topic of controversy. How, when and whether to monitor CKD patients for potential iron overload remain to be elucidated. This review addresses the question of risk and benefit of iron administration in CKD, highlights the evidence supporting current practice, provides an overview of standard and potential new markers of iron status and outlines a new pharmacometric approach to physiologically compatible individualized dosing of ESA and iron in CKD patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-196
Number of pages10
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • anemia
  • erythropoiesis
  • iron
  • iron deficiency
  • iron overload
  • kidney disease

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Iron dosing in kidney disease: Inconsistency of evidence and clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this