Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma: Pleomorphic Versus Classical Subtype, Associations and Prognosis

  • Ying L. Liu
  • , Christine Choi
  • , Shing M. Lee
  • , Xiaobo Zhong
  • , Hanina Hibshoosh
  • , Kevin Kalinsky
  • , Eileen P. Connolly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although pleomorphic compared with classic histology is considered a poor prognostic factor in lobular breast cancer, studies are small and conflicting. In our retrospective review, we found that progression-free survival was worse in the pleomorphic group; however, these differences disappeared after adjustment for cancer stage, suggesting that pleomorphic histology does not independently predict clinical outcomes. Background: Invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma (IPLC) has been associated with a worse prognosis compared with classic invasive lobular carcinoma (cILC); however, studies are small and conflicting. We seek to examine the prognosis of women with IPLC compared with cILC. Methods: A retrospective review of women with breast cancer at a single institution from 2003 to 2012 identified 193 women with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). IPLC was defined as ILC with a pathological description of primarily pleomorphic features and Nottingham histological grade score of 7, 8, or 9 or overall grade of 3 or mixed classic/pleomorphic features and overall grade of 3. All others were designated cILCs. Clinicopathologic variables, progression-free survival (PFS), per STEEP criteria, and overall survival (OS), using all-cause mortality, were examined in both groups. Results: Of the 193 women, 46 (24%) had IPLC and 147 (76%) had cILC. The IPLC group had significantly higher stage at diagnosis and more Hispanic women, but there were no differences in other clinicopathologic features or treatment. Median follow-up was 57 months (0.1-155 months). In univariate analysis, IPLC was associated with worse PFS (log-rank P =.09, Wilcoxon P =.01) but no significant differences in OS (log-rank P =.20, Wilcoxon P =.16). In multivariate models adjusting for stage, IPLC was not significantly associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-2.79; P =.30) or OS (HR 1.52; 95% CI, 0.58-4.01; P =.40). Conclusions: IPLC was initially associated with worse PFS, but this was attenuated after adjustment for cancer stage, and there were no differences in OS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-120
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Breast Cancer
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Histology
  • Risk factor
  • Staging
  • Survival
  • Tumor grade

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invasive Lobular Breast Carcinoma: Pleomorphic Versus Classical Subtype, Associations and Prognosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this