Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

Prakash Krishnan; Arthur Tarricone; Purushothaman K-Raman; Farhan Majeed; Vishal Kapur; Karthik Gujja; Jose Wiley; Miguel Vasquez; Rheoneil A. Lascano; Katherine G. Quiles; Tashanne Distin; Ran Fontenelle; Farah Atallah-Lajam; Annapoorna Kini; Samin Sharma

doi:10.1177/1753944717745509

Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

Prakash Krishnan, Arthur Tarricone, Purushothaman K-Raman, Farhan Majeed, Vishal Kapur, Karthik Gujja, Jose Wiley, Miguel Vasquez, Rheoneil A. Lascano, Katherine G. Quiles, Tashanne Distin, Ran Fontenelle, Farah Atallah-Lajam, Annapoorna Kini, Samin Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. Methods and results: This was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up. Conclusions: Directional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	17-22
Number of pages	6
Journal	Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Volume	12
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944717745509
State	Published - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

atherectomy
in-stent restenosis
intravascular ultrasound

Access to Document

10.1177/1753944717745509

Cite this

Krishnan, P., Tarricone, A., K-Raman, P., Majeed, F., Kapur, V., Gujja, K., Wiley, J., Vasquez, M., Lascano, R. A., Quiles, K. G., Distin, T., Fontenelle, R., Atallah-Lajam, F., Kini, A., & Sharma, S. (2018). Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, 12(1), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944717745509

@article{811e4d68bbc14908b879f2e296c4e3ab,

title = "Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis",

abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. Methods and results: This was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up. Conclusions: Directional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.",

keywords = "atherectomy, in-stent restenosis, intravascular ultrasound",

author = "Prakash Krishnan and Arthur Tarricone and Purushothaman K-Raman and Farhan Majeed and Vishal Kapur and Karthik Gujja and Jose Wiley and Miguel Vasquez and Lascano, {Rheoneil A.} and Quiles, {Katherine G.} and Tashanne Distin and Ran Fontenelle and Farah Atallah-Lajam and Annapoorna Kini and Samin Sharma",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2017.",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1753944717745509",

language = "English",

volume = "12",

pages = "17--22",

journal = "Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease",

issn = "1753-9447",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "1",

}

Krishnan, P, Tarricone, A, K-Raman, P, Majeed, F, Kapur, V , Gujja, K, Wiley, J, Vasquez, M, Lascano, RA, Quiles, KG, Distin, T, Fontenelle, R, Atallah-Lajam, F, Kini, A & Sharma, S 2018, 'Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis', Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944717745509

Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. / Krishnan, Prakash; Tarricone, Arthur; K-Raman, Purushothaman et al.
In: Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

AU - Krishnan, Prakash

AU - Tarricone, Arthur

AU - K-Raman, Purushothaman

AU - Majeed, Farhan

AU - Kapur, Vishal

AU - Gujja, Karthik

AU - Wiley, Jose

AU - Vasquez, Miguel

AU - Lascano, Rheoneil A.

AU - Quiles, Katherine G.

AU - Distin, Tashanne

AU - Fontenelle, Ran

AU - Atallah-Lajam, Farah

AU - Kini, Annapoorna

AU - Sharma, Samin

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. Methods and results: This was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up. Conclusions: Directional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis using directional atherectomy guided by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography. Methods and results: This was a retrospective analysis for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis treated with IVUS-guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography from a single center between March 2012 and February 2016. Clinically driven target lesion revascularization was the primary endpoint and was evaluated through medical chart review as well as phone call follow up. Conclusions: Directional atherectomy guided by IVUS reduces clinically driven target lesion revascularization for patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.

KW - atherectomy

KW - in-stent restenosis

KW - intravascular ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038912576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1753944717745509

DO - 10.1177/1753944717745509

M3 - Article

C2 - 29265002

AN - SCOPUS:85038912576

SN - 1753-9447

VL - 12

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

JF - Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease

IS - 1

ER -

Intravascular ultrasound guided directional atherectomy versus directional atherectomy guided by angiography for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this