TY - JOUR
T1 - Intervening With Smoking Parents of Inpatients to Reduce Exposure
T2 - The INSPIRE Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Wilson, Karen M.
AU - Moss, Angela
AU - Lowary, Michelle
AU - Holstein, Jacqueline
AU - Gambino, Jessica
AU - Juarez-Colunga, Elizabeth
AU - Kerby, Gwendolyn S.
AU - Klein, Jonathan D.
AU - Hovell, Melbourne
AU - Winickoff, Jonathan P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial statement: This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute R01CA181207, intervening with smoking parents of inpatients to reduce exposure (INSPIRE), as well as support from the Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute through a grant to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Julius B. Richmond Center of Excellence, and the Children's Hospital, Colorado Research Institute. None of these organizations had any role in the study design, collection, analysis, or decision to publish. We would like to recognize the assistance of Cordelia Elaiho, MPH, in the manuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Academic Pediatric Association
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: Hospitalized children have high rates of tobacco smoke exposure; parents who smoke may be receptive to interventions during their child's hospitalization. Objective: We tested the efficacy of a smoking cessation intervention for parents of hospitalized children. Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind clinical trial from 12/14-5/18 at the Children's Hospital Colorado. Hospitalized children who had a parent who smoked tobacco were eligible. Intervention: Intervention participants received motivational interviewing sessions, 2 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy; both groups received referral to the Quitline Consenting parents completed a questionnaire; urine was collected from the child for measurement of cotinine. Our primary outcome was: 1) increase in reporting “no one is allowed to smoke anywhere” in the home (smoke-free home rule). Additional outcomes included: 2) change in child's cotinine from baseline to 1 year, and 3) parental quitting at 1 year. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and t tests for bivariable data, and multivariable logistic and linear regression. Results: Of 1641 eligible families approached, 252 were randomized (15%); 149 families had follow-up data at 12 months (59%). In the adjusted analysis, there was no difference between the groups in smoke free home rules, or child cotinine level; in an intention-to-treat analysis, 15% in the intervention group versus 8% of controls reported quit (p=0.07). Conclusions: A smoking cessation intervention can be delivered to parents of hospitalized children. While hospitalization provides an opportunity to help parents quit smoking, more efficient and effective engagement strategies are needed to optimize tobacco control success.
AB - Background: Hospitalized children have high rates of tobacco smoke exposure; parents who smoke may be receptive to interventions during their child's hospitalization. Objective: We tested the efficacy of a smoking cessation intervention for parents of hospitalized children. Methods: We conducted a randomized, single-blind clinical trial from 12/14-5/18 at the Children's Hospital Colorado. Hospitalized children who had a parent who smoked tobacco were eligible. Intervention: Intervention participants received motivational interviewing sessions, 2 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy; both groups received referral to the Quitline Consenting parents completed a questionnaire; urine was collected from the child for measurement of cotinine. Our primary outcome was: 1) increase in reporting “no one is allowed to smoke anywhere” in the home (smoke-free home rule). Additional outcomes included: 2) change in child's cotinine from baseline to 1 year, and 3) parental quitting at 1 year. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and t tests for bivariable data, and multivariable logistic and linear regression. Results: Of 1641 eligible families approached, 252 were randomized (15%); 149 families had follow-up data at 12 months (59%). In the adjusted analysis, there was no difference between the groups in smoke free home rules, or child cotinine level; in an intention-to-treat analysis, 15% in the intervention group versus 8% of controls reported quit (p=0.07). Conclusions: A smoking cessation intervention can be delivered to parents of hospitalized children. While hospitalization provides an opportunity to help parents quit smoking, more efficient and effective engagement strategies are needed to optimize tobacco control success.
KW - clinical trials
KW - secondhand tobacco smoke exposure
KW - smoking cessation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121398868&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2021.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2021.11.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85121398868
VL - 22
SP - 997
EP - 1005
JO - Academic Pediatrics
JF - Academic Pediatrics
SN - 1876-2859
IS - 6
ER -