International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound

Giovanni Volpicelli, Mahmoud Elbarbary, Michael Blaivas, Daniel A. Lichtenstein, Gebhard Mathis, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Lawrence Melniker, Luna Gargani, Vicki E. Noble, Gabriele Via, Anthony Dean, James W. Tsung, Gino Soldati, Roberto Copetti, Belaid Bouhemad, Angelika Reissig, Eustachio Agricola, Jean Jacques Rouby, Charlotte Arbelot, Andrew LiteploAshot Sargsyan, Fernando Silva, Richard Hoppmann, Raoul Breitkreutz, Armin Seibel, Luca Neri, Enrico Storti, Tomislav Petrovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1981 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence-based and expert consensus recommendations for lung ultrasound with focus on emergency and critical care settings. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of 28 experts from eight countries was involved. Literature was reviewed from January 1966 to June 2011. Consensus members searched multiple databases including Pubmed, Medline, OVID, Embase, and others. The process used to develop these evidence-based recommendations involved two phases: determining the level of quality of evidence and developing the recommendation. The quality of evidence is assessed by the grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method. However, the GRADE system does not enforce a specific method on how the panel should reach decisions during the consensus process. Our methodology committee decided to utilize the RAND appropriateness method for panel judgment and decisions/ consensus. Results: Seventythree proposed statements were examined and discussed in three conferences held in Bologna, Pisa, and Rome. Each conference included two rounds of face-to-face modified Delphi technique. Anonymous panel voting followed each round. The panel did not reach an agreement and therefore did not adopt any recommendations for six statements. Weak/ conditional recommendations were made for 2 statements, and strong recommendations were made for the remaining 65 statements. The statements were then recategorized and grouped to their current format. Internal and external peer-review processes took place before submission of the recommendations. Updates will occur at least every 4 years or whenever significant major changes in evidence appear. Conclusions: This document reflects the overall results of the first consensus conference on point-of-care lung ultrasound. Statements were discussed and elaborated by experts who published the vast majority of papers on clinical use of lung ultrasound in the last 20 years. Recommendations were produced to guide implementation, development, and standardization of lung ultrasound in all relevant settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-591
Number of pages15
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Keywords

  • Chest sonography Emergency ultrasound
  • Critical ultrasound
  • GRADE Evidence-based medicine
  • Guideline
  • Lung ultrasound
  • Point-of-care ultrasound
  • RAND

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this