TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into the l,d-Transpeptidases and d,d-Carboxypeptidase of Mycobacterium abscessus
T2 - Ceftaroline, Imipenem, and Novel Diazabicyclooctane Inhibitors
AU - Dousa, Khalid M.
AU - Kurz, Sebastian G.
AU - Taracila, Magdalena A.
AU - Bonfield, Tracey
AU - Bethel, Christopher R.
AU - Barnes, Melissa D.
AU - Selvaraju, Suresh
AU - Abdelhamed, Ayman M.
AU - Kreiswirth, Barry N.
AU - Boom, W. Henry
AU - Kasperbauer, Shannon H.
AU - Daley, Charles L.
AU - Bonomo, Robert A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Foreign copyrights may apply.
PY - 2020/7/22
Y1 - 2020/7/22
N2 - Mycobacterium abscessus is a highly drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). Efforts to discover new treatments for M. abscessus infections are accelerating, with a focus on cell wall synthesis proteins (M. abscessus l,d-transpeptidases 1 to 5 [LdtMab1 to LdtMab5] and d,d-carboxypeptidase) that are targeted by β-lactam antibiotics. A challenge to this approach is the presence of chromosomally encoded β-lactamase (BlaMab). Using a mechanism-based approach, we found that a novel ceftaroline-imipenem combination effectively lowered the MICs of M. abscessus isolates (MIC50 ≤ 0.25 μg/ml; MIC90 ≤ 0.5 μg/ml). Combining ceftaroline and imipenem with a β-lactamase inhibitor, i.e., relebactam or avibactam, demonstrated only a modest effect on susceptibility compared to each of the β-lactams alone. In steady-state kinetic assays, BlaMab exhibited a lower Ki app (0.30 ± 0.03 μM for avibactam and 136 ± 14 μM for relebactam) and a higher acylation rate for avibactam (k2/K = 3.4 × 105 ± 0.4 × 105 M-1 s-1 for avibactam and 6 × 102 ± 0.6 × 102 M-1 s-1 for relebactam). The kcat/Km was nearly 10-fold lower for ceftaroline fosamil (0.007 ± 0.001 μM-1 s-1) than for imipenem (0.056 ± 0.006 μM-1 s-1). Timed mass spectrometry captured complexes of avibactam and BlaMab, LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, and d,d-carboxypeptidase, whereas relebactam bound only BlaMab, LdtMab1, and LdtMab2 Interestingly, LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, LdtMab5, and d,d-carboxypeptidase bound only to imipenem when incubated with imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil. We next determined the binding constants of imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil for LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, and LdtMab5 and showed that imipenem bound >100-fold more avidly than ceftaroline fosamil to LdtMab1 and LdtMab2 (e.g., Ki app or Km of LdtMab1 = 0.01 ± 0.01 μM for imipenem versus 0.73 ± 0.08 μM for ceftaroline fosamil). Molecular modeling indicates that LdtMab2 readily accommodates imipenem, but the active site must widen to ≥8 Å for ceftaroline to enter. Our analysis demonstrates that ceftaroline and imipenem binding to multiple targets (l,d-transpeptidases and d,d-carboxypeptidase) and provides a mechanistic rationale for the effectiveness of this dual β-lactam combination in M. abscessus infections.
AB - Mycobacterium abscessus is a highly drug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM). Efforts to discover new treatments for M. abscessus infections are accelerating, with a focus on cell wall synthesis proteins (M. abscessus l,d-transpeptidases 1 to 5 [LdtMab1 to LdtMab5] and d,d-carboxypeptidase) that are targeted by β-lactam antibiotics. A challenge to this approach is the presence of chromosomally encoded β-lactamase (BlaMab). Using a mechanism-based approach, we found that a novel ceftaroline-imipenem combination effectively lowered the MICs of M. abscessus isolates (MIC50 ≤ 0.25 μg/ml; MIC90 ≤ 0.5 μg/ml). Combining ceftaroline and imipenem with a β-lactamase inhibitor, i.e., relebactam or avibactam, demonstrated only a modest effect on susceptibility compared to each of the β-lactams alone. In steady-state kinetic assays, BlaMab exhibited a lower Ki app (0.30 ± 0.03 μM for avibactam and 136 ± 14 μM for relebactam) and a higher acylation rate for avibactam (k2/K = 3.4 × 105 ± 0.4 × 105 M-1 s-1 for avibactam and 6 × 102 ± 0.6 × 102 M-1 s-1 for relebactam). The kcat/Km was nearly 10-fold lower for ceftaroline fosamil (0.007 ± 0.001 μM-1 s-1) than for imipenem (0.056 ± 0.006 μM-1 s-1). Timed mass spectrometry captured complexes of avibactam and BlaMab, LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, and d,d-carboxypeptidase, whereas relebactam bound only BlaMab, LdtMab1, and LdtMab2 Interestingly, LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, LdtMab5, and d,d-carboxypeptidase bound only to imipenem when incubated with imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil. We next determined the binding constants of imipenem and ceftaroline fosamil for LdtMab1, LdtMab2, LdtMab4, and LdtMab5 and showed that imipenem bound >100-fold more avidly than ceftaroline fosamil to LdtMab1 and LdtMab2 (e.g., Ki app or Km of LdtMab1 = 0.01 ± 0.01 μM for imipenem versus 0.73 ± 0.08 μM for ceftaroline fosamil). Molecular modeling indicates that LdtMab2 readily accommodates imipenem, but the active site must widen to ≥8 Å for ceftaroline to enter. Our analysis demonstrates that ceftaroline and imipenem binding to multiple targets (l,d-transpeptidases and d,d-carboxypeptidase) and provides a mechanistic rationale for the effectiveness of this dual β-lactam combination in M. abscessus infections.
KW - Mycobacterium abscessus
KW - antibiotic resistance
KW - antibiotics
KW - bacteria
KW - ceftaroline
KW - diazabicyclooctane
KW - imipenem
KW - inhibitor
KW - mycobacteria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088611504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/AAC.00098-20
DO - 10.1128/AAC.00098-20
M3 - Article
C2 - 32393499
AN - SCOPUS:85088611504
SN - 0066-4804
VL - 64
JO - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
JF - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
IS - 8
ER -