Initial Comparison of Resident and Attending Milestones Evaluations in Plastic Surgery

Background Graduate medical education has recently undergone a major archetypal shift toward competency-based evaluations of residentsʼ performance. The implementation of the Milestones program by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) is a core component of the shift, designed to ensure uniformity in measuring residency knowledge using a series of specialty-specific achievements. This study evaluates the correlation between residentsʼ self-evaluations and program directorsʼ assessments of their performance. Methods The study population comprised 12 plastic surgery residents, ranging from postgraduate year 1 to postgraduate year 6, enrolled in an integrated residency program at a single institution. Results Overall, average attending scores were lower than average resident scores at all levels except postgraduate year 6. Correlation between resident and attending evaluations ranged from 0.417 to 0.957, with the correlation of average scores of Patient Care (0.854) and Medical Knowledge (0.816) Milestones significantly higher than those of professional skillsets (0.581). “Patient care, facial esthetics” was the Milestone with the lowest average scores from both groups. Residents scored themselves notably higher than their attendingsʼ evaluations in Practice-based Learning and Improvement categories (+0.958) and notably lower in Medical Knowledge categories such as “Cosmetic Surgery, Trunk and Lower Extremities” (−0.375) and “Non-trauma hand” (−0.208). The total possible number of participants in this study was 12. The actual number of participants was 12 (100%). Conclusions The remarkable range of correlations suggests that expectations for performance standards may vary widely between residents and program directors. Understanding gaps between expectations and performance is vital to inform current and future residents as the restructuring of the accreditation process continues.