TY - JOUR
T1 - Inequities in Chlamydia trachomatis Screening Between Black and White Adolescents in a Large Pediatric Primary Care Network, 2015-2019
AU - Wood, Sarah
AU - Min, Jungwon
AU - Tam, Vicky
AU - Pickel, Julia
AU - Petsis, Danielle
AU - Campbell, Kenisha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Public Health Association Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Objectives: To identify associations between patient race and annual chlamydia screening among adolescent females. Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study of females aged 15 to 19 years in a 31-clinic pediatric primary care network in Pennsylvania and New Jersey from 2015 through 2019. Using mixedeffect logistic regressions, we estimated associations between annual chlamydia screening and patient (race/ethnicity, age, previous chlamydia screening and infection, insurance type) and clinic (size, setting) characteristics. We decomposed potential effects of clinician's implicit racial bias and screening, using covariates measuring the proportion of Black patients in each clinician's practice. Results: There were 68 935 well visits among 37 817 females, who were 28.8% Black and 25.8% Medicaid insured. The mean annual chlamydia screening rate was 11.1%. Black females had higher odds of screening (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]51.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]51.51, 1.84) than did White females. In the clinician characteristics model, individual clinicians were more likely to screen their Black versus non-Black patients (AOR51.88; 95% CI51.65, 2.15). Conclusions: Racial bias may affect screening practices and should be addressed in future interventions, given the critical need to increase population-level chlamydia screening.
AB - Objectives: To identify associations between patient race and annual chlamydia screening among adolescent females. Method: We performed a retrospective cohort study of females aged 15 to 19 years in a 31-clinic pediatric primary care network in Pennsylvania and New Jersey from 2015 through 2019. Using mixedeffect logistic regressions, we estimated associations between annual chlamydia screening and patient (race/ethnicity, age, previous chlamydia screening and infection, insurance type) and clinic (size, setting) characteristics. We decomposed potential effects of clinician's implicit racial bias and screening, using covariates measuring the proportion of Black patients in each clinician's practice. Results: There were 68 935 well visits among 37 817 females, who were 28.8% Black and 25.8% Medicaid insured. The mean annual chlamydia screening rate was 11.1%. Black females had higher odds of screening (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]51.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]51.51, 1.84) than did White females. In the clinician characteristics model, individual clinicians were more likely to screen their Black versus non-Black patients (AOR51.88; 95% CI51.65, 2.15). Conclusions: Racial bias may affect screening practices and should be addressed in future interventions, given the critical need to increase population-level chlamydia screening.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122908701
U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306498
DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306498
M3 - Article
C2 - 34936422
AN - SCOPUS:85122908701
SN - 0090-0036
VL - 112
SP - 135
EP - 143
JO - American Journal of Public Health
JF - American Journal of Public Health
IS - 1
ER -