TY - JOUR
T1 - Incremental Utility of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
T2 - Quantifying the Relapse Risk Associated with Therapeutic Effect(Figure presented.)
AU - Pederzoli, Filippo
AU - Bandini, Marco
AU - Briganti, Alberto
AU - Plimack, Elizabeth R.
AU - Niegisch, Günter
AU - Yu, Evan Y.
AU - Bamias, Aristotelis
AU - Agarwal, Neeraj
AU - Sridhar, Srikala S.
AU - Sternberg, Cora N.
AU - Vaishampayan, Ulka N.
AU - Théodore, Christine
AU - Rosenberg, Jonathan E.
AU - Harshman, Lauren C.
AU - Bellmunt, Joaquim
AU - Galsky, Matthew D.
AU - Gallina, Andrea
AU - Salonia, Andrea
AU - Montorsi, Francesco
AU - Necchi, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association of Urology
PY - 2019/10
Y1 - 2019/10
N2 - The availability of new potent systemic therapies for urothelial carcinoma may change the way we use standard chemotherapy perioperatively. In particular, identifying which patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is compelling. From a multicenter database we selected 950 patients with cT2–4N0M0 MIBC treated with radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and AC. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to test 1-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates according to AC use. Nomogram-derived probabilities of 1-yr recurrence after RC were plotted against actual recurrence rates according to AC use. Overall, we did not see evidence of an AC effect on the 1-yr RFS rate (p = 0.6). Conversely, the 1-yr RFS rate was higher among patients with pT3–4 or pN1 disease who received AC (75% vs 54%; p < 0.001). We were unable to demonstrate a difference between AC and no AC among patients who received prior NAC (1-yr RFS 57% vs 76%; p = 0.057). As the most important finding, AC was associated with incremental RFS benefits only for patients with a nomogram-derived 1-yr recurrence probability of >40%. Patient summary: Maximizing disease control with adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who had a calculated recurrence risk of >40% and did not impact cancer recurrence in lower-risk disease. Therefore, patient stratification using the nomogram available for predicting recurrence is advisable pending external validation.
AB - The availability of new potent systemic therapies for urothelial carcinoma may change the way we use standard chemotherapy perioperatively. In particular, identifying which patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is compelling. From a multicenter database we selected 950 patients with cT2–4N0M0 MIBC treated with radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and AC. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to test 1-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates according to AC use. Nomogram-derived probabilities of 1-yr recurrence after RC were plotted against actual recurrence rates according to AC use. Overall, we did not see evidence of an AC effect on the 1-yr RFS rate (p = 0.6). Conversely, the 1-yr RFS rate was higher among patients with pT3–4 or pN1 disease who received AC (75% vs 54%; p < 0.001). We were unable to demonstrate a difference between AC and no AC among patients who received prior NAC (1-yr RFS 57% vs 76%; p = 0.057). As the most important finding, AC was associated with incremental RFS benefits only for patients with a nomogram-derived 1-yr recurrence probability of >40%. Patient summary: Maximizing disease control with adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who had a calculated recurrence risk of >40% and did not impact cancer recurrence in lower-risk disease. Therefore, patient stratification using the nomogram available for predicting recurrence is advisable pending external validation.
KW - Adjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Immunotherapy
KW - Muscle-invasive bladder cancer
KW - Nomogram
KW - Recurrence-free survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068583256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.032
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.032
M3 - Article
C2 - 31303258
AN - SCOPUS:85068583256
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 76
SP - 425
EP - 429
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 4
ER -