TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing Lesion Dimensions of Bipolar Ablation by Modulating the Surface Area of the Return Electrode
AU - Younis, Arwa
AU - Yavin, Hagai D.
AU - Higuchi, Koji
AU - Zilberman, Israel
AU - Sroubek, Jakub
AU - Tchou, Patrick
AU - Bubar, Zachary P.
AU - Barkagan, Michael
AU - Leshem, Eran
AU - Shapira-Daniels, Ayelet
AU - Kanj, Mohamad
AU - Cantillon, Daniel J.
AU - Hussein, Ayman A.
AU - Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
AU - Saliba, Walid I.
AU - Koruth, Jacob S.
AU - Anter, Elad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Objectives: This study sought to examine the effect of the return electrode's surface area on bipolar RFA lesion size. Background: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is typically performed between 2 3.5-mm tip catheters serving as active and return electrodes. We hypothesized that increasing the surface area of the return electrode would increase lesion dimensions by reducing the circuit impedance, thus increasing the current into a larger tissue volume enclosed between the electrodes. Methods: In step 1, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and custom-made return electrodes with increasing surface areas (20, 80, 180 mm2). In step 2, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and 3.5-mm or 8-mm electrode catheters positioned perpendicular or parallel to the tissue. In step 3, in vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and either 3.5-mm or 8-mm parallel electrode at the: 1) left ventricular summit; 2) interventricular septum; and 3) healed anterior infarction. Results: In step 1, increasing the surface area of the return electrode resulted in lower circuit impedance (R = −0.65; P < 0.001), higher current (R = +0.80; P < 0.001), and larger lesion volume (R = +0.88; P < 0.001). In step 2, an 8-mm return electrode parallel to tissue produced larger and deeper lesions compared with a 3.5-mm return electrode (P = 0.014 and P = 0.02). Similarly, in step 3, compared with a 3.5-mm, bipolar RFA with an 8-mm return electrode produced larger (volume: 1,525 ± 871 mm3 vs 306 ± 310 mm3, respectively; P < 0.001) and more transmural lesions (88% vs 0%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Bipolar RFA using an 8-mm return electrode positioned parallel to the tissue produces larger lesions in comparison with a 3.5-mm return electrode.
AB - Objectives: This study sought to examine the effect of the return electrode's surface area on bipolar RFA lesion size. Background: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is typically performed between 2 3.5-mm tip catheters serving as active and return electrodes. We hypothesized that increasing the surface area of the return electrode would increase lesion dimensions by reducing the circuit impedance, thus increasing the current into a larger tissue volume enclosed between the electrodes. Methods: In step 1, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and custom-made return electrodes with increasing surface areas (20, 80, 180 mm2). In step 2, ex vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and 3.5-mm or 8-mm electrode catheters positioned perpendicular or parallel to the tissue. In step 3, in vivo bipolar RFA was performed between 3.5-mm and either 3.5-mm or 8-mm parallel electrode at the: 1) left ventricular summit; 2) interventricular septum; and 3) healed anterior infarction. Results: In step 1, increasing the surface area of the return electrode resulted in lower circuit impedance (R = −0.65; P < 0.001), higher current (R = +0.80; P < 0.001), and larger lesion volume (R = +0.88; P < 0.001). In step 2, an 8-mm return electrode parallel to tissue produced larger and deeper lesions compared with a 3.5-mm return electrode (P = 0.014 and P = 0.02). Similarly, in step 3, compared with a 3.5-mm, bipolar RFA with an 8-mm return electrode produced larger (volume: 1,525 ± 871 mm3 vs 306 ± 310 mm3, respectively; P < 0.001) and more transmural lesions (88% vs 0%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Bipolar RFA using an 8-mm return electrode positioned parallel to the tissue produces larger lesions in comparison with a 3.5-mm return electrode.
KW - bipolar ablation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - electrophysiology
KW - radiofrequency
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127855689
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.01.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.01.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35450605
AN - SCOPUS:85127855689
SN - 2405-500X
VL - 8
SP - 498
EP - 510
JO - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 4
ER -