TY - JOUR
T1 - Inattentive and noninattentive ADHD children
T2 - Do they constitute a unitary group?
AU - Halperin, Jeffrey M.
AU - Newcorn, Jeffrey H.
AU - Sharma, Vanshdeep
AU - Healey, Jane M.
AU - Wolf, Lorraine E.
AU - Pascualvaca, Daisy M.
AU - Schwartz, Susan
PY - 1990/8
Y1 - 1990/8
N2 - Teacher-rated ADHD and normal control children were administered a continuous performance test (CPT), and were then further subdivided based upon the presence or absence of objectively assessed attentional deficits. In addition, children were assessed using several measures of cognitive and behavioral functioning. Attentional deficits were signficantly more prevalent among the ADHD group, but about half of the ADHD children showed no evidence of objectively assessed attentional dysfunction. Further group analyses indicated that ADHD children with objectively assessed attentional dysfunction appeared cognitively impaired, while ADHD children without objective evidence of attentional dysfunction had more conduct problems. CPT inattention was not related to the presence of cognitive impairments or conduct problems in the control group. These data must be considered preliminary because teacher ratings were the only source of diagnosis and a single measure of inattention was used. However, they suggest that two subtypes of ADHD children can be identified, one characterized by inattention and learning problems, and the other by conduct problems.
AB - Teacher-rated ADHD and normal control children were administered a continuous performance test (CPT), and were then further subdivided based upon the presence or absence of objectively assessed attentional deficits. In addition, children were assessed using several measures of cognitive and behavioral functioning. Attentional deficits were signficantly more prevalent among the ADHD group, but about half of the ADHD children showed no evidence of objectively assessed attentional dysfunction. Further group analyses indicated that ADHD children with objectively assessed attentional dysfunction appeared cognitively impaired, while ADHD children without objective evidence of attentional dysfunction had more conduct problems. CPT inattention was not related to the presence of cognitive impairments or conduct problems in the control group. These data must be considered preliminary because teacher ratings were the only source of diagnosis and a single measure of inattention was used. However, they suggest that two subtypes of ADHD children can be identified, one characterized by inattention and learning problems, and the other by conduct problems.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025153236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF00917645
DO - 10.1007/BF00917645
M3 - Article
C2 - 2246434
AN - SCOPUS:0025153236
SN - 0091-0627
VL - 18
SP - 437
EP - 449
JO - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
JF - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
IS - 4
ER -