Abstract
Aim: To compare the effectiveness of in-class transition to all-oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) following parenteral bortezomib (V)-based induction versus continued V-based therapy in US oncology clinics. Patients & methods: Non-transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) receiving in-class transition to IRd (N = 100; US MM-6), or V-based therapy (N = 111; INSIGHT MM). Results: Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, overall response rate was 73.2% with IRd versus 57.5% with V-based therapy (p < 0.0001). Median duration of treatment was 10.8 versus 5.3 months (p < 0.0001). Overall, 18/24% of patients discontinued IRd/V-based therapy due to adverse events. Conclusion: IRd after V-based induction was associated with significantly improved overall response rate and duration of treatment than continued V-based combination therapy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 131-143 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Future Oncology |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- In-class transition
- Ixazomib
- oral therapy
- proteasome inhibitor
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'In-class transition from bortezomib-based therapy to IRd is an effective approach in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver