TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved detection sensitivity of anti-PRV variant antibodies through preparation of anti-gB and anti-gE monoclonal antibodies and development of blocking ELISAs
AU - Guo, Zhenyang
AU - Xu, Hu
AU - Zhang, Siyu
AU - Kang, Haonan
AU - Li, Chao
AU - Sun, Qi
AU - Zhao, Jing
AU - Li, Jinhao
AU - Zhou, Guohui
AU - Wang, Qian
AU - Xiang, Lirun
AU - Tang, Yandong
AU - Liu, Huairan
AU - Leng, Chaoliang
AU - An, Tongqing
AU - Cai, Xuehui
AU - Tian, Zhijun
AU - Zhang, Hongliang
AU - Peng, Jinmei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Since 2011, PRV has resurged in China and is characterized by a mutated strain with significant alterations in antigenicity and virulence. Therefore, we hypothesized that antibody detection kits based on classic PRV strains may have limitations in detecting PRV variants. For more sensitive antibody detection of PRV variants, two MABs targeting the gB and gE proteins were developed. IFA revealed that these MABs exhibited strong reactivity toward both classic and variant PRV strains. MAB-gE recognizes a novel conserved linear B-cell epitope (41PSAEVWD47), while MAB-gB recognizes a conformational B-cell epitope. The binding of both MABs was effectively inhibited in the PRV-positive pig blood samples. Accordingly, we established blocking-ELISAs to detect anti-PRV gB and gE antibodies, which achieved higher sensitivity than commercial kits. Moreover, the clinical serum samples results of our method and that of IFA were in high agreement, and our test results had a higher coincidence rate than that of a commercial kit. Assessing antibody levels by our methods at various times following immunization and challenge accurately reflected the trend of antibody-level changes and revealed the conversion to positive antibody status before the commercial kit. Our method is crucial for monitoring PRV infections, assessing immune responses, and controlling disease.
AB - Since 2011, PRV has resurged in China and is characterized by a mutated strain with significant alterations in antigenicity and virulence. Therefore, we hypothesized that antibody detection kits based on classic PRV strains may have limitations in detecting PRV variants. For more sensitive antibody detection of PRV variants, two MABs targeting the gB and gE proteins were developed. IFA revealed that these MABs exhibited strong reactivity toward both classic and variant PRV strains. MAB-gE recognizes a novel conserved linear B-cell epitope (41PSAEVWD47), while MAB-gB recognizes a conformational B-cell epitope. The binding of both MABs was effectively inhibited in the PRV-positive pig blood samples. Accordingly, we established blocking-ELISAs to detect anti-PRV gB and gE antibodies, which achieved higher sensitivity than commercial kits. Moreover, the clinical serum samples results of our method and that of IFA were in high agreement, and our test results had a higher coincidence rate than that of a commercial kit. Assessing antibody levels by our methods at various times following immunization and challenge accurately reflected the trend of antibody-level changes and revealed the conversion to positive antibody status before the commercial kit. Our method is crucial for monitoring PRV infections, assessing immune responses, and controlling disease.
KW - Blocking ELISA
KW - Monoclonal antibody and B-cell epitope
KW - Pseudorabies virus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182743620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129425
DO - 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129425
M3 - Article
C2 - 38219937
AN - SCOPUS:85182743620
SN - 0141-8130
VL - 260
JO - International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
JF - International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
M1 - 129425
ER -