TY - JOUR
T1 - Implicit brain imaging
AU - Mémoli, Facundo
AU - Sapiro, Guillermo
AU - Thompson, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is partially supported by ONR, NSF, NIH, and CSIC-Uruguay. Additional support was provided by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (grant R21 EB01561) and National Center for Research Resources (R21 RR019771). We thank Prof. Stanley Osher for ongoing collaboration on solving PDEs on and onto manifolds.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - We describe how implicit surface representations can be used to solve fundamental problems in brain imaging. This kind of representation is not only natural following the state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms reported in the literature to extract the different brain tissues, but it is also, as shown in this paper, the most appropriate one from the computational point of view. Examples are provided for finding constrained special curves on the cortex, such as sulcal beds, regularizing surface-based measures, such as cortical thickness, and for computing warping fields between surfaces such as the brain cortex. All these result from efficiently solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and variational problems on surfaces represented in implicit form. The implicit framework avoids the need to construct intermediate mappings between 3-D anatomical surfaces and parametric objects such planes or spheres, a complex step that introduces errors and is required by many other cortical processing approaches.
AB - We describe how implicit surface representations can be used to solve fundamental problems in brain imaging. This kind of representation is not only natural following the state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms reported in the literature to extract the different brain tissues, but it is also, as shown in this paper, the most appropriate one from the computational point of view. Examples are provided for finding constrained special curves on the cortex, such as sulcal beds, regularizing surface-based measures, such as cortical thickness, and for computing warping fields between surfaces such as the brain cortex. All these result from efficiently solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and variational problems on surfaces represented in implicit form. The implicit framework avoids the need to construct intermediate mappings between 3-D anatomical surfaces and parametric objects such planes or spheres, a complex step that introduces errors and is required by many other cortical processing approaches.
KW - Brain imaging
KW - Cortex
KW - Implicit surface representation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/7044239646
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.072
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.072
M3 - Article
C2 - 15501087
AN - SCOPUS:7044239646
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 23
SP - S179-S188
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
IS - SUPPL. 1
ER -