TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of unilateral stroke on right hemisphere superiority in executive control
AU - Russell-Giller, Shira
AU - Wu, Tingting
AU - Spagna, Alfredo
AU - Dhamoon, Mandip
AU - Hao, Qing
AU - Fan, Jin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/1/8
Y1 - 2021/1/8
N2 - In our previous study, we have demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in executive control of attention, with the right hemisphere being more efficient in dealing with conflict for stimuli presented in the left visual field. However, the unique and synergetic contribution of the two hemispheres to this superiority effect is still elusive. Here, using the lateralized attention network test, we compared the flanker conflict effect for stimuli presented in the left and right visual fields in patients with an ischemic stroke in the right or left hemisphere as the unilateral lesion groups and in patients with a transient ischemic attack without an acute infarction as the control group. In contrast to the transient ischemic attack group, which demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in conflict processing, there was no evidence for such an effect in both unilateral stroke groups. These results can be explained by our model proposing that there is bilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the left visual field and unilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the right visual field, resulting in more efficient processing for the left visual field, i.e., the right hemisphere superiority effect. When there is damage to either hemisphere, the responsibility of conflict processing will largely fall on the intact hemisphere, eliminating the right hemisphere superiority effect.
AB - In our previous study, we have demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in executive control of attention, with the right hemisphere being more efficient in dealing with conflict for stimuli presented in the left visual field. However, the unique and synergetic contribution of the two hemispheres to this superiority effect is still elusive. Here, using the lateralized attention network test, we compared the flanker conflict effect for stimuli presented in the left and right visual fields in patients with an ischemic stroke in the right or left hemisphere as the unilateral lesion groups and in patients with a transient ischemic attack without an acute infarction as the control group. In contrast to the transient ischemic attack group, which demonstrated a right hemisphere superiority in conflict processing, there was no evidence for such an effect in both unilateral stroke groups. These results can be explained by our model proposing that there is bilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the left visual field and unilateral hemispheric involvement for conflict processing for information received from the right visual field, resulting in more efficient processing for the left visual field, i.e., the right hemisphere superiority effect. When there is damage to either hemisphere, the responsibility of conflict processing will largely fall on the intact hemisphere, eliminating the right hemisphere superiority effect.
KW - Executive control
KW - Lateralization
KW - Right hemisphere superiority
KW - Unilateral stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097478099&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107693
DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107693
M3 - Article
C2 - 33238172
AN - SCOPUS:85097478099
SN - 0028-3932
VL - 150
JO - Neuropsychologia
JF - Neuropsychologia
M1 - 107693
ER -