Impact of the 2012 United States preventive services task force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: Analysis of urologic and primary care practices

Tomy Y. Perez, Matthew R. Danzig, Rashed A. Ghandour, Ketan K. Badani, Mitchell C. Benson, James M. McKiernan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To identify the effect of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recommendation statement on primary care referral patterns and urologists' decision making.

Methods Men referred to our institution for newly elevated PSA level from June 2011 to June 2013 were identified. Patients with a prior history of prostate cancer or biopsy were excluded. Clinical and management parameters were compared between those presenting in the year before vs the year after the USPSTF statement. Factors predictive of receiving a prostate biopsy were identified using multivariate regression analysis.

Results A total of 201 men were identified in the pre-USPSTF period and 212 men, thereafter. The groups were comparable in age, race, prostate cancer family history, PSA values, and digital rectal examination findings. At the initial evaluation, patients presenting after the statement were more likely to undergo PCA3 testing (27% vs 11%; P <.01) and repeat PSA testing (82% vs 72%; P =.02) and less likely to undergo immediate biopsy (16% vs 24%; P =.03). The proportion of patients ultimately receiving a biopsy was equivalent. The groups were similar in the percentage of positive biopsies, Gleason distribution, and D'Amico risk. African American race and family history were predictors for receiving a biopsy in the post-USPSTF group but not in the pre-USPSTF group.

Conclusion The 2012 USPSTF recommendation statement has not affected the number or clinical characteristics of patients referred to a tertiary center for elevated PSA level. After recommendation, urologists ordered significantly more PCA3 and repeat PSA tests and recommended fewer biopsies at the initial visit. The fraction of patients ultimately receiving a biopsy remained the same.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-91
Number of pages7
JournalUrology
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of the 2012 United States preventive services task force statement on prostate-specific antigen screening: Analysis of urologic and primary care practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this