Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in patients treated with radical prostatectomy

  • M. Rieken
  • , L. A. Kluth
  • , E. Xylinas
  • , C. Seitz
  • , H. Fajkovic
  • , P. I. Karakiewicz
  • , Y. Lotan
  • , A. Briganti
  • , W. Loidl
  • , T. Faison
  • , J. J. Crivelli
  • , D. S. Scherr
  • , A. Bachmann
  • , A. K. Tewari
  • , A. Kautzky-Willer
  • , K. Pummer
  • , S. F. Shariat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background:The impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial.Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 6842 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) between 2000 and 2011. Uni-and multivariable cox regression models addressed the association of statin use with BCR.Results:Overall, 2275 (33.3%) patients used statins. Statin users were older and had a higher rate of positive surgical margins than patients not using statins (P-values ≤0.05). Within a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8-42 months), 778 (11.4%) patients experienced BCR. Actuarial estimate 5-years BCR-free survival was 82%±1 for patients without statin use and 84±1% for patients using statins (P=0.05); statin use was not associated with BCR (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.03, P=0.10) after adjusting for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features.Conclusions:In PC patients undergoing RP, statin use was not independently associated with lower risk of BCR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-371
Number of pages5
JournalProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biochemical recurrence
  • Radical prostatectomy
  • Statins

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in patients treated with radical prostatectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this