Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Routine Angiographic Follow-Up on the Clinical Benefits of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents. Results From the TAXUS-IV Trial

  • Duane S. Pinto
  • , Gregg W. Stone
  • , Stephen G. Ellis
  • , David A. Cox
  • , James Hermiller
  • , Charles O'Shaughnessy
  • , J. Tift Mann
  • , Roxana Mehran
  • , Yingbo Na
  • , Mark Turco
  • , Ronald Caputo
  • , Jeffrey J. Popma
  • , Donald E. Cutlip
  • , Mary E. Russell
  • , David J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

127 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of angiographic follow-up on revascularization rates in the TAXUS-IV trial and to determine whether the relative benefit of paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation compared with bare metal stent implantation was modified by angiographic follow-up. Background: Although several clinical trials have demonstrated that drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), virtually all of these studies have incorporated angiographic follow-up. Methods: In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 percutaneous coronary intervention patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) (n = 662) or identical-appearing BMS (n = 652). Clinical outcomes were compared, stratified by assignment to angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. Results: Compared with clinical follow-up alone, angiographic follow-up patients had a significantly higher rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.46; p = 0.04), with similar relative increases in PES and BMS patients. Because PES reduced TVR by ∼60% regardless of type of follow-up, assignment to angiographic follow-up tended to overestimate the absolute benefit of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. In contrast, assessment of end points immediately before the time of follow-up angiography led to substantial underestimation of the absolute benefit of PES implantation. Conclusions: Performance of mandatory angiographic follow-up increases rates of TVR among patients receiving both BMS and PES and overestimates the absolute clinical benefits of PES relative to clinical follow-up alone. Nonetheless, PES substantially reduces TVR regardless of assignment to mandatory angiographic follow-up or not. Future studies designed to determine the true clinical benefits of DES should either forgo routine angiographic follow-up or separate the time of repeat angiography from the primary clinical end point by as long as possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-36
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Routine Angiographic Follow-Up on the Clinical Benefits of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents. Results From the TAXUS-IV Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this