TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of radiotherapy on daily function among older adults living with advanced cancer (RT impact on function in advanced cancer)
AU - Nehlsen, Anthony
AU - Agarwal, Parul
AU - Mazumdar, Madhu
AU - Dutta, Pinaki
AU - Goldstein, Nathan E.
AU - Dharmarajan, Kavita V.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a pilot award from the National Institute on Aging Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center under Grant #5P30AG028741 awarded to Kavita V. Dharmarajan. The authors also wish to acknowledge the support of Biostatics Shared Resource Facility, Icahn School of Medicine, and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant #P30CA196521–01. The authors have no financial disclosures or conflicts to report. The authors do not have any proprietary interests in the materials described in the article.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background: While radiation therapy (RT) improves function, and quality of life for patients with advanced cancers, patients frequently experience a period of acute toxicity during which functional abilities may decline. Little is understood about changes in functional outcomes after RT in older adults. This study aims to examine changes in daily function at 1 and 6 months following RT. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 117 patients who underwent palliative RT on a prospective registry. Activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores ranging from 0 to 6 and 0–8, respectively, were collected at baseline, one-month, and six months post-RT. Patients were classified as low deficit for ADL/IADL if they had 0–1 deficits and high deficit if they had 2+ deficits. Results: One-hundred seventy RT courses were identified; 99 were evaluable at each time point. The median age was 67 years. At baseline, 29.5 and 29.9% of patients were classified as high-deficit for ADL and IADL functioning, respectively. At one-month, the majority of patients who were low-deficit at baseline remained so for both measures while approximately one quarter of high-deficit patients showed improvement. Most patients identified as low-deficit at one-month remained so at six-months, while no high-deficit patients improved from one- to six-months. Factors associated with high ADL and IADL deficits included: time (six months), increasing age, and Hispanic/other race. Compared to those with ECOG score of 3, patients with lower scores (0–2) had lower odds of high deficit. Conclusion: ADL and IADL tools may be useful in describing changes in daily function after palliative RT and in identifying groups of patients who may benefit from additional supportive geriatric care interventions.
AB - Background: While radiation therapy (RT) improves function, and quality of life for patients with advanced cancers, patients frequently experience a period of acute toxicity during which functional abilities may decline. Little is understood about changes in functional outcomes after RT in older adults. This study aims to examine changes in daily function at 1 and 6 months following RT. Methods: We reviewed the charts of 117 patients who underwent palliative RT on a prospective registry. Activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scores ranging from 0 to 6 and 0–8, respectively, were collected at baseline, one-month, and six months post-RT. Patients were classified as low deficit for ADL/IADL if they had 0–1 deficits and high deficit if they had 2+ deficits. Results: One-hundred seventy RT courses were identified; 99 were evaluable at each time point. The median age was 67 years. At baseline, 29.5 and 29.9% of patients were classified as high-deficit for ADL and IADL functioning, respectively. At one-month, the majority of patients who were low-deficit at baseline remained so for both measures while approximately one quarter of high-deficit patients showed improvement. Most patients identified as low-deficit at one-month remained so at six-months, while no high-deficit patients improved from one- to six-months. Factors associated with high ADL and IADL deficits included: time (six months), increasing age, and Hispanic/other race. Compared to those with ECOG score of 3, patients with lower scores (0–2) had lower odds of high deficit. Conclusion: ADL and IADL tools may be useful in describing changes in daily function after palliative RT and in identifying groups of patients who may benefit from additional supportive geriatric care interventions.
KW - ADL
KW - IADL
KW - Palliative RT
KW - Radiation oncology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111934325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.07.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.07.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 34362714
AN - SCOPUS:85111934325
SN - 1879-4068
VL - 13
SP - 46
EP - 52
JO - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
JF - Journal of Geriatric Oncology
IS - 1
ER -