Impact of race-neutral eGFR calculations on African American kidney transplant candidate wait time: A single center retrospective analysis

Rafael Khaim, Rachel Todd, Andrew Rosowicz, Ron Shapiro, Sander Florman, Leona Kim-Schluger, Fasika Tedla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Race-inclusive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) could contribute to racial disparity in access to kidney transplantation. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) issued a policy allowing waiting time modification for candidates affected by race-inclusive eGFR calculations. Implementation of the new OPTN policy at the kidney transplant program of the Mount Sinai Hospital involved review of 921 African American candidates, of whom 240 (26%) candidates gained a median of 1 year and 10 months. The duration of time candidates gained varied from a minimum of 5 days to a maximum of 12 years and 3 months; 45.4% gained at least 2 years, and 12% gained at least 4 years of wait time. Among those who gained wait time, 20 (8.3%) candidates received deceased donor kidney transplants. Candidates who gained wait time had similar sociodemographic characteristics as those who did not, except that the median age for the former was higher by 3 years (59 vs. 56). Our early data suggest that the current policy on waiting time modification for candidates affected by race-inclusive estimation of GFR has the potential to improve racial disparity in access to kidney transplantation. However, the generalizability of our findings to other centers requires further study.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere15267
JournalClinical Transplantation
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS)
  • glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
  • waitlist management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of race-neutral eGFR calculations on African American kidney transplant candidate wait time: A single center retrospective analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this