Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of race and ethnicity on the clinical and angiographic characteristics, social determinants of health, and 1-year outcomes after everolimus-eluting coronary stent procedures in women insights from the pooled platinum diversity and PROMUS element plus postapproval studies

  • Roxana Mehran
  • , Jaya Chandrasekhar
  • , Scott Davis
  • , Sandeep Nathan
  • , Roger Hill
  • , Steven Hearne
  • , Vince Vismara
  • , Robert Pyo
  • , Elie Gharib
  • , Zafir Hawa
  • , George Chrysant
  • , David Kandzari
  • , Paul Underwood
  • , Dominic J. Allocco
  • , Wayne Batchelor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of race/ethnicity on coronary stent outcomes in women is unknown. We compared baseline characteristics, social determinants of health, and 1-year outcomes in female African Americans (AA) and Hispanic/Latinas (HL) versus white women after coronary everolimus-eluting stent implantation in all-comer patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We pooled 1863 women from the PLATINUM Diversity (n=1057 women) and PROMUS ELEMENT PLUS (n=806 women) postapproval studies, with some overlap in study sites. Social determinants of health data were only available for PLATINUM Diversity. The primary end point was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). Outcomes were risk adjusted using multivariate Cox regression. The study sample comprised 1417 white (76.1%, reference group), 296 AA (15.9%), and 107 HL (5.7%) women. AA were older, and both AA and HL had more diabetes mellitus and hypertension than white women. AA had larger reference vessel diameters but less lesion calcification, whereas HL had less lesion tortuosity but more calcification. Compared with white women, there was a trend toward higher unadjusted 1-year major adverse cardiac events in AA (12.0% versus 8.0%; P=0.06) but similar rates in HL (11.0% versus 8.0%; P=0.32), and after risk adjustment, there were no differences (AA women: hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.00–2.17; HL women: hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.71–2.44). AA had a 3-fold higher adjusted risk of 1-year myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.72–7.14; P=0.01) and increased risk of target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.10–2.94; P=0.02). Independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events included renal disease, prior myocardial infarction, silent ischemia, history of stroke, and multivessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity confer heterogeneity in women undergoing everolimus-eluting stent implantation. Despite more comorbidities and less favorable social determinants of health, AA and HL women have similar 1-year major adverse cardiac events to white women, although AA women seem to have a higher risk of 1-year myocardial infarction.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Continental population groups
  • Drug-eluting stent
  • Ethnic groups
  • Everolimus
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Women

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of race and ethnicity on the clinical and angiographic characteristics, social determinants of health, and 1-year outcomes after everolimus-eluting coronary stent procedures in women insights from the pooled platinum diversity and PROMUS element plus postapproval studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this