Impact of neutropenia evaluated in terms of the D-index on invasive fungal disease while on empiric or preemptive antifungal treatment strategy in the early phase after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background: We retrospectively evaluated the association between the D-index, which reflects both the depth and duration of neutropenia, and proven/probable invasive fungal disease (IFD) early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at our center (n = 394). Methods: The D-index was defined as the area over the neutrophil curve during neutropenia. The cumulative D-index from the start of neutropenia until the development of infection (c-D-index) was also evaluated as a real-time assessment of neutropenia. Results: There were 19 cases of early proven/probable IFD before and within 1 week after engraftment. Fifteen cases (78.9%) were seen as breakthrough infection while on empiric (n = 7), preemptive (n = 4) or prophylactic (n = 4) antifungal administration with mold-active agents. The c-D-index and lower performance status were identified as independent significant predictive factors for IFD. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the D-index and c-D-index were more accurate than the simple duration of neutropenia and as accurate as the duration of profound neutropenia for predicting IFD. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the c-D-index using an appropriate cutoff (CO) value (10 644) determined by ROC curve analysis were 73.1%, 63.2%, 9.1%, and 97.9%, respectively. The advantage of the c-D-index to cumulative days of neutropenia in terms of positive and negative predictive values seemed to be small. Conclusions: The appropriate CO value for the c-D-index for predicting IFD was as high as 10 644 in allogeneic HSCT with a more frequent use of empiric antifungal therapy. The c-D-index is useful for assessing the risk of breakthrough IFD.