Impact of Cusp-Overlap View for TAVR with Self-Expandable Valves on 30-Day Conduction Disturbances

  • Oscar A. Mendiz
  • , Marko Noč
  • , Carlos M. Fava
  • , Luis Abel Gutiérrez Jaikel
  • , Matias Sztejfman
  • , Aleš Pleskovič
  • , Paul Gamboa
  • , León R. Valdivieso
  • , Hemal Gada
  • , Gilbert H.L. Tang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aim. Conduction disturbances leading to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) remains a common complication for TAVR procedures, particularly when self-expanding valves are used. We compared the 30-day incidence of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI) rate between two consecutive groups using either conventional 3-cusp coplanar view (CON) and right/left cusp-overlap view (COVL) for implantation. Methods and Results. We retrospectively compared 257 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with self-expandable valves using either CON (n = 101) or COVL (n = 156) in four intermediate/low volume centers. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. The 30-day incidence of new-onset LBBB (12.9% vs. 5.8%; p=0.05) and PPMI rate (17.8% vs. 6.4%; p=0.004) was significantly lower when using the COVL implantation view. There was no difference between the CON and COVL groups in 30-day incidence of death (4.9% vs. 2.6%), any stroke (0% vs. 0.6%), and the need for surgical aortic valve replacement (0% for both groups). Conclusion. Using the COVL view for implantation, we achieved a significant reduction of the LBBB and PPMI rate after TAVR in comparison with the traditional CON view, without compromising the TAVR outcomes when using self-expandable prostheses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9991528
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiology
Volume2021
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Cusp-Overlap View for TAVR with Self-Expandable Valves on 30-Day Conduction Disturbances'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this