TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of bridge therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients submitted to liver transplantation
T2 - A Brazilian multicenter study
AU - Brazilian HCC Study Group
AU - Margon, Julia Fadini
AU - Chagas, Aline Lopes
AU - Mattos, Angelo A.
AU - Diniz, Márcio A.
AU - Felga, Guilherme E.G.
AU - Boin, Ilka F.S.F.
AU - da Silva, Renato Ferreira
AU - Garcia, José Huygens Parente
AU - Lima, Agnaldo Soares
AU - da Silva, Rita C.M.A.
AU - Costa, Paulo Everton Garcia
AU - Zanotelli, Maria Lúcia
AU - Coelho, Júlio Cezar Uili
AU - Watanabe, André L.C.
AU - Terrabuio, Débora Raquel
AU - Reichert, Paulo Roberto
AU - Bittencourt, Paulo Lisboa
AU - Pereira, Leila M.M.Beltrão
AU - Carneiro-D'Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto
AU - Carrilho, Flair José
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/5
Y1 - 2025/5
N2 - Introduction and objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a main indication for liver transplantation (LT). Bridge therapy (BT) is recommended when waiting time on transplant list is longer than 6 months to prevent dropout. However, the prognostic role of locoregional treatment in post-LT outcomes needs to be better defined. Our aims were to evaluate the impact of BT on post-LT overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) among LT recipients with HCC. Materials and Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study in HCC patients submitted to LT with clinical and radiological data analysis. Clinical features, BT and tumor response according to mRECIST were analyzed. Post-LT OS and RFS according to this were compared. Results: 1,119 patients were included. Waiting time on transplant list was longer than 6 months in 49 % of patients and 67 % underwent BT. Transarterial-chemoembolization/embolization were the most common treatments performed (80 %). According to mRECIST, 37 % showed complete response (CR), 38 % partial response (PR), 12 % stable disease (SD) and 13 % progressive disease (PD). The OS was 63 % in 5y in a mean follow-up of 28 months. Post-LT tumor recurrence was 8 %. There were no differences in RFS or OS among patients who underwent or not BT. However, patients who achieved CR had a higher RFS compared to PR, SD or PD (p = 0.019) and the objective response to treatment was an independent predictor of lower recurrence risk. Conclusions: In a large multicentric cohort of LT recipients we observed that patients that achieved CR after BT presented lower risk of post-LT tumor recurrence.
AB - Introduction and objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a main indication for liver transplantation (LT). Bridge therapy (BT) is recommended when waiting time on transplant list is longer than 6 months to prevent dropout. However, the prognostic role of locoregional treatment in post-LT outcomes needs to be better defined. Our aims were to evaluate the impact of BT on post-LT overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) among LT recipients with HCC. Materials and Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort study in HCC patients submitted to LT with clinical and radiological data analysis. Clinical features, BT and tumor response according to mRECIST were analyzed. Post-LT OS and RFS according to this were compared. Results: 1,119 patients were included. Waiting time on transplant list was longer than 6 months in 49 % of patients and 67 % underwent BT. Transarterial-chemoembolization/embolization were the most common treatments performed (80 %). According to mRECIST, 37 % showed complete response (CR), 38 % partial response (PR), 12 % stable disease (SD) and 13 % progressive disease (PD). The OS was 63 % in 5y in a mean follow-up of 28 months. Post-LT tumor recurrence was 8 %. There were no differences in RFS or OS among patients who underwent or not BT. However, patients who achieved CR had a higher RFS compared to PR, SD or PD (p = 0.019) and the objective response to treatment was an independent predictor of lower recurrence risk. Conclusions: In a large multicentric cohort of LT recipients we observed that patients that achieved CR after BT presented lower risk of post-LT tumor recurrence.
KW - Liver neoplasm
KW - Locoregional treatment
KW - Recurrence
KW - Transplant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216510763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.liver.2025.100258
DO - 10.1016/j.liver.2025.100258
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216510763
SN - 2666-9676
VL - 18
JO - Journal of Liver Transplantation
JF - Journal of Liver Transplantation
M1 - 100258
ER -