TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of antipsychotic medication on family burden in schizophrenia
T2 - Longitudinal results of CATIE trial
AU - Perlick, Deborah A.
AU - Rosenheck, Robert A.
AU - Kaczynski, Richard
AU - Swartz, Marvin S.
AU - Canive, Jose M.
AU - Lieberman, Jeffrey A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author (DP) had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. This article was based on results from the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) project, supported by the National Institute of Mental Health ( N01 MH90001 ). The project was carried out by principal investigators from the University of North Carolina, Duke University, the University of Southern California, the University of Rochester, and Yale University in association with Quintiles, Inc.; the program staff of the Division of Interventions and Services Research of the NIMH; and investigators from 56 sites in the United States (CATIE Study Investigators Group). Medication was provided by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P., Eli Lilly and Company, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., and Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Foundation of Hope of Raleigh, NC also supported this work.
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of first- and second-generation antipsychotics in reducing family burden associated with schizophrenia. Methods: The family caregivers of 623 SCID-diagnosed patients enrolled in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) randomly assigned to a first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) or one of four second-generation drugs (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone) were interviewed about resources provided and stresses experienced at baseline and followed for 18 months. Patient symptoms, side effects and service use were assessed as well. Hierarchical regression analyses evaluated the effect of treatment assignment on four burden factors: problem behavior, resource demands and disruption, impairment in activities of daily living and patient helpfulness. Intention-to-treat analyses with all available observations classified based on initial treatment assignment, including observations after medications changed were followed by secondary analyses excluding observations after the first medication change, i.e. only considering initial medication. Results: Despite significant reductions on the problem behavior and resource demands/disruption factors, there were no significant differences between perphenazine and any of the second-generation medications. When only initial treatment period observations were included, patients were perceived as more helpful when medicated with perphenazine as compared to risperidone. In comparisons between second-generation drugs, patients on quetiapine were perceived as more helpful than those on risperidone (p = 0.004). Conclusion: In this 18-month randomized trial, there was no evidence of superiority of second-generation antipsychotics in relieving family burden.
AB - Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of first- and second-generation antipsychotics in reducing family burden associated with schizophrenia. Methods: The family caregivers of 623 SCID-diagnosed patients enrolled in the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) randomly assigned to a first-generation antipsychotic (perphenazine) or one of four second-generation drugs (olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone or ziprasidone) were interviewed about resources provided and stresses experienced at baseline and followed for 18 months. Patient symptoms, side effects and service use were assessed as well. Hierarchical regression analyses evaluated the effect of treatment assignment on four burden factors: problem behavior, resource demands and disruption, impairment in activities of daily living and patient helpfulness. Intention-to-treat analyses with all available observations classified based on initial treatment assignment, including observations after medications changed were followed by secondary analyses excluding observations after the first medication change, i.e. only considering initial medication. Results: Despite significant reductions on the problem behavior and resource demands/disruption factors, there were no significant differences between perphenazine and any of the second-generation medications. When only initial treatment period observations were included, patients were perceived as more helpful when medicated with perphenazine as compared to risperidone. In comparisons between second-generation drugs, patients on quetiapine were perceived as more helpful than those on risperidone (p = 0.004). Conclusion: In this 18-month randomized trial, there was no evidence of superiority of second-generation antipsychotics in relieving family burden.
KW - Family burden
KW - Schizophrenia
KW - Second-generation antipsychotics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74849123947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.026
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 19864114
AN - SCOPUS:74849123947
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 116
SP - 118
EP - 125
JO - Schizophrenia Research
JF - Schizophrenia Research
IS - 2-3
ER -