Impact and determinants of door in–door out time for stroke thrombectomy transfers in a large hub-and-spoke network

Rashid A. Ahmed, James R. Withers, Joyce A. McIntyre, Thabele M. Leslie-Mazwi, Alvin S. Das, Adam A. Dmytriw, Joshua A. Hirsch, James D. Rabinov, Omer Doron, Christopher J. Stapleton, Aman B. Patel, Aneesh B. Singhal, Natalia S. Rost, Robert W. Regenhardt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The mantra “time is brain” cannot be overstated for patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke. This is especially true for those with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) requiring transfer to an endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) capable center. We sought to evaluate the spoke hospital door in–door out (DIDO) times for patients transferred to our hub center for EVT. Methods: Individuals who first presented with LVO to a spoke hospital and were then transferred to the hub for EVT were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database from January 2019 to November 2022. DIDO was defined as the time between spoke hospital door in arrival and door out exit. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared, dichotomizing DIDO at 90 minutes based in the American Heart Association goal for DIDO ≤90 minutes for 50% of transfers. Multivariable regression analyses were performed for determinants of the 90-day ordinal modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and DIDO. Results: We identified 194 patients transferred for EVT with available DIDO. The median age was 67 years (IQR 57–80), and 46% were female. The median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 16 (10–20), 50% were treated with intravenous thrombolysis at a spoke, and TICI 2B-3 reperfusion was achieved in 87% at the hub. The median DIDO was 120 minutes (97–149), with DIDO ≤90 minutes achieved in 18%. DIDO was a significant determinant of 90-day ordinal mRS (B = 0.007, 95% CI = 0.001–0.012, p = 0.013), even when accounting for the last known well-to-spoke door in, spoke door out-to-hub arrival, hub arrival-to-puncture, puncture-to-first pass, age, NIHSS, intravenous thrombolysis, TICI 2B-3, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Importantly, determinants of DIDO included Black race or Hispanic ethnicity (B = 0.918, 95% CI = 0.010–1.826, p = 0.048), atrial fibrillation or heart failure (B = 0.793, 95% CI = 0.257–1.329, p = 0.004), and basilar LVO location (B = 2.528, 95% CI = 1.154–3.901, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Spoke DIDO was the most important period of time for long-term outcomes of LVO stroke patients treated with EVT. Targets were identified to reduce DIDO and improve patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInterventional Neuroradiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • acute ischemic stroke
  • door in–door out
  • hub and spoke
  • Large vessel occlusion
  • thrombectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact and determinants of door in–door out time for stroke thrombectomy transfers in a large hub-and-spoke network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this