Immunological and respiratory findings in swine farmers

Eugenija Zuskin, Bozica Kanceljak, E. Neil Schachter, Jadranka Mustajbegovic, Satindra Goswami, Saul Maayani, Zvi Marom, Nicholas Rienzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

The prevalence of respiratory symptoms and ventilatory capacity abnormalities in relation to immunological status was studied in 32 swine farmers and in 39 controls. A large number of swine farmers reacted to swine confinement building antigens (swine hair, 34%, swine confinement agents, 28%) but also to other extracts such as animal food (78%) and corn flour (37%). Control workers also reacted to these antigens in similar frequencies. Increased serum IgE levels were found in 3 swine farmers (9.4%) and all 3 had positive skin tests to at least one of the swine antigens. Among control workers one (2.6%) had an increased serum IgE level; this worker exhibited a positive skin reaction to swine food antigen. Swine farmers with positive skin reactions had across-shift reductions of FEF50 and FEF25 significantly larger than those with negative skin tests (P < 0.01). Preshift measured ventilatory capacity data (FEV1, FEF50, FEF25) in swine farmers with positive skin tests were significantly lower (compared to predicted) than in those with negative skin tests. Additionally, we showed that a water-soluble swine confinement building antigen causes a dose-related contraction of nonsensitized guinea pig trachea smooth muscle studied in vitro. Our data indicate significant differences in lung function between swine workers with positive and negative skin tests. We suggest that skin testing may be helpful in identifying workers at risk for developing lung disease.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-130
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Research
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immunological and respiratory findings in swine farmers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this