Immunoglobulin repletion during blinatumomab therapy does not reduce the rate of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia and associated infectious risk

Stephanie Wo, Hannah Levavi, John Mascarenhas, Marina Kremyanskaya, Shyamala Navada, Michal Bar-Natan, Sara S. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Blinatumomab has demonstrated efficacy in minimal residual disease (MRD) positive and relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) by inciting rapid and sustained B-cell depletion. Methods Owing to its effect on B-cells, blinatumomab is associated with a higher rate of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia compared to chemotherapy. To mitigate blinatumomab-induced hypogammaglobulinemia, patients were pre-emptively repleted with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) during blinatumomab therapy. In this retrospective study, we compared outcomes of 23 blinatumomab treated adults with ALL. Seventeen patients routinely received IVIG and 6 patients were in the control cohort. Results Our findings demonstrated no difference between the two cohorts in immunoglobulin G (IgG) nadir (338 mg/dL vs. 337 mg/dL, P=0.641), days to IgG nadir (120.5 vs. 85.5 days, P=0.13), infection rate (82.4% vs. 66.7%, P=0.58), infections requiring ICU admission (23.5% vs. 16.7%, P=1), and infection related mortality (17.6% vs. 16.7%, P=1). Conclusion Pre-emptive IVIG repletion during blinatumomab did not prevent hypogammaglobulinemia and associated infection risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-143
Number of pages9
JournalBlood Research
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2022

Keywords

  • ALL
  • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • Blinatumomab
  • Hypogammaglobulinemia
  • Intravenous immunoglobulin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immunoglobulin repletion during blinatumomab therapy does not reduce the rate of secondary hypogammaglobulinemia and associated infectious risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this