TY - JOUR
T1 - Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in ChAdOx1-S-primed participants (CombiVacS)
T2 - a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial
AU - CombiVacS Study Group
AU - Borobia, Alberto M.
AU - Carcas, Antonio J.
AU - Pérez-Olmeda, Mayte
AU - Castaño, Luis
AU - Bertran, María Jesús
AU - García-Pérez, Javier
AU - Campins, Magdalena
AU - Portolés, Antonio
AU - González-Pérez, María
AU - García Morales, María Teresa
AU - Arana-Arri, Eunate
AU - Aldea, Marta
AU - Díez-Fuertes, Francisco
AU - Fuentes, Inmaculada
AU - Ascaso, Ana
AU - Lora, David
AU - Imaz-Ayo, Natale
AU - Barón-Mira, Lourdes E.
AU - Agustí, Antonia
AU - Pérez-Ingidua, Carla
AU - Gómez de la Cámara, Agustín
AU - Arribas, José Ramón
AU - Ochando, Jordi
AU - Alcamí, José
AU - Belda-Iniesta, Cristóbal
AU - Frías, Jesús
AU - Martínez de Soto, Lucía
AU - Rodríguez Mariblanca, Amelia
AU - Díaz García, Lucía
AU - Ramírez García, Elena
AU - Seco Meseguer, Enrique
AU - Stewart Balbás, Stefan Mark
AU - Marín Candón, Alicia
AU - García García, Irene
AU - Urroz Elizalde, Mikel
AU - Monserrat Villatoro, Jaime
AU - de la Rosa, Paula
AU - Sanz García, Marta
AU - López Crespo, Cristina
AU - Mauleón Martínez, Vega
AU - de Madariaga Castell, Raquel
AU - Vitón Vara, Laura
AU - García Rodríguez, Julio
AU - Buño, Antonio
AU - López Granados, Eduardo
AU - Cámara, Carmen
AU - Rey Cuevas, Esther
AU - Ayllon García, Pilar
AU - Jiménez González, María
AU - Hernández Rubio, Victoria
N1 - Funding Information:
Trial conceptualisation was done by CB-I, AMB, AJC, JA, and JF. AJC, IF, and AAg developed the study methods. AMB, MP-O, LC, MJB, JG-P, MC, AP, MG-P, EA-A, MA, FD-F, AAs, NI-A, LEB-M, CP-I, JO, and JRA were study investigators. MTGM, DL, and AGC ensured data accuracy. AMB, AJC, MP-O, DL, AGC, JO, JA, and JF were responsible for statistical analysis. CB-I, AMB, MP-O, LC, MC, MJB, AP, JO, JA, JF, and JRA supervised the study. CB-I was responsible for funding acquisition. CB-I, AMB, AJC, MP-O, JO, JA, and JF wrote the original draft of the Article. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript, and approved the manuscript for submission. All authors reviewed and approved the original draft. All authors had full access to the full data in the study and accept responsibility to submit for publication.
Funding Information:
AMB, AJC, JO, and JF are members of the VACCELERATE (European Corona Vaccine Trial Accelerator Platform) Network, which aims to facilitate and accelerate the design and implementation of COVID-19 phase 2 and 3 vaccine trials. JO is a member of the INsTRuCT (Innovative Training in Myeloid Regulatory Cell Therapy) Consortium, a network of European scientists from academia and industry focused on developing innovative immunotherapies. This work is funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III, a Spanish public body assigned to the Ministry of Science and Innovation that manages and promotes public clinical research related to public health. The Spanish Clinical Trials Platform is a public network funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (grant numbers PTC20/00018 and PT17/0017), the State Plan for Research, Development, and Innovation 2013–16, the State Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation 2017–20, and the Subdirectorate General for Evaluation and Promotion of Research, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced with FEDER funds. CombiVacS was designed under the umbrella of the VACCELERATE project. VACCELERATE and INsTRuCT received funding from the EU's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement numbers 101037867 and 860003). The Health Institute Carlos III is the Spanish partner in the VACCELERATE project. The authors thank all trial participants, the international data safety monitoring board, and the trial steering committee (appendix 3 pp 26–27). The authors thank Esther Prieto for editorial assistance and writing support (employed by Hospital Universitario La Paz; funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, grant number PCT20/00018). All contributors thank Raquel Yotti for her thorough, critical review of the manuscript, and her contributions to the overall conceptualisation of the clinical trial.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/7/10
Y1 - 2021/7/10
N2 - Background: To date, no immunological data on COVID-19 heterologous vaccination schedules in humans have been reported. We assessed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BioNTech, Mainz, Germany) administered as second dose in participants primed with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca, Oxford, UK). Methods: We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised, controlled trial on adults aged 18–60 years, vaccinated with a single dose of ChAdOx1-S 8–12 weeks before screening, and no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either BNT162b2 (0·3 mL) via a single intramuscular injection (intervention group) or continue observation (control group). The primary outcome was 14-day immunogenicity, measured by immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein and receptor binding domain (RBD). Antibody functionality was assessed using a pseudovirus neutralisation assay, and cellular immune response using an interferon-γ immunoassay. The safety outcome was 7-day reactogenicity, measured as solicited local and systemic adverse events. The primary analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of BNT162b2 and who had at least one efficacy evaluation after baseline. The safety analysis included all participants who received BNT162b2. This study is registered with EudraCT (2021-001978-37) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04860739), and is ongoing. Findings: Between April 24 and 30, 2021, 676 individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=450) or control group (n=226) at five university hospitals in Spain (mean age 44 years [SD 9]; 382 [57%] women and 294 [43%] men). 663 (98%) participants (n=441 intervention, n=222 control) completed the study up to day 14. In the intervention group, geometric mean titres of RBD antibodies increased from 71·46 BAU/mL (95% CI 59·84–85·33) at baseline to 7756·68 BAU/mL (7371·53–8161·96) at day 14 (p<0·0001). IgG against trimeric spike protein increased from 98·40 BAU/mL (95% CI 85·69–112·99) to 3684·87 BAU/mL (3429·87–3958·83). The interventional:control ratio was 77·69 (95% CI 59·57–101·32) for RBD protein and 36·41 (29·31–45·23) for trimeric spike protein IgG. Reactions were mild (n=1210 [68%]) or moderate (n=530 [30%]), with injection site pain (n=395 [88%]), induration (n=159 [35%]), headache (n=199 [44%]), and myalgia (n=194 [43%]) the most commonly reported adverse events. No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: BNT162b2 given as a second dose in individuals prime vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S induced a robust immune response, with an acceptable and manageable reactogenicity profile. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Translations: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
AB - Background: To date, no immunological data on COVID-19 heterologous vaccination schedules in humans have been reported. We assessed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BioNTech, Mainz, Germany) administered as second dose in participants primed with ChAdOx1-S (Vaxzevria, AstraZeneca, Oxford, UK). Methods: We did a phase 2, open-label, randomised, controlled trial on adults aged 18–60 years, vaccinated with a single dose of ChAdOx1-S 8–12 weeks before screening, and no history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either BNT162b2 (0·3 mL) via a single intramuscular injection (intervention group) or continue observation (control group). The primary outcome was 14-day immunogenicity, measured by immunoassays for SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein and receptor binding domain (RBD). Antibody functionality was assessed using a pseudovirus neutralisation assay, and cellular immune response using an interferon-γ immunoassay. The safety outcome was 7-day reactogenicity, measured as solicited local and systemic adverse events. The primary analysis included all participants who received at least one dose of BNT162b2 and who had at least one efficacy evaluation after baseline. The safety analysis included all participants who received BNT162b2. This study is registered with EudraCT (2021-001978-37) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04860739), and is ongoing. Findings: Between April 24 and 30, 2021, 676 individuals were enrolled and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (n=450) or control group (n=226) at five university hospitals in Spain (mean age 44 years [SD 9]; 382 [57%] women and 294 [43%] men). 663 (98%) participants (n=441 intervention, n=222 control) completed the study up to day 14. In the intervention group, geometric mean titres of RBD antibodies increased from 71·46 BAU/mL (95% CI 59·84–85·33) at baseline to 7756·68 BAU/mL (7371·53–8161·96) at day 14 (p<0·0001). IgG against trimeric spike protein increased from 98·40 BAU/mL (95% CI 85·69–112·99) to 3684·87 BAU/mL (3429·87–3958·83). The interventional:control ratio was 77·69 (95% CI 59·57–101·32) for RBD protein and 36·41 (29·31–45·23) for trimeric spike protein IgG. Reactions were mild (n=1210 [68%]) or moderate (n=530 [30%]), with injection site pain (n=395 [88%]), induration (n=159 [35%]), headache (n=199 [44%]), and myalgia (n=194 [43%]) the most commonly reported adverse events. No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: BNT162b2 given as a second dose in individuals prime vaccinated with ChAdOx1-S induced a robust immune response, with an acceptable and manageable reactogenicity profile. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Translations: For the French and Spanish translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109438020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01420-3
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01420-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 34181880
AN - SCOPUS:85109438020
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 398
SP - 121
EP - 130
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10295
ER -