TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying typical trajectories in longitudinal data
T2 - modelling strategies and interpretations
AU - Herle, Moritz
AU - Micali, Nadia
AU - Abdulkadir, Mohamed
AU - Loos, Ruth
AU - Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
AU - Hübel, Christopher
AU - Bulik, Cynthia M.
AU - De Stavola, Bianca L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Individual-level longitudinal data on biological, behavioural, and social dimensions are becoming increasingly available. Typically, these data are analysed using mixed effects models, with the result summarised in terms of an average trajectory plus measures of the individual variations around this average. However, public health investigations would benefit from finer modelling of these individual variations which identify not just one average trajectory, but several typical trajectories. If evidence of heterogeneity in the development of these variables is found, the role played by temporally preceding (explanatory) variables as well as the potential impact of differential trajectories may have on later outcomes is often of interest. A wide choice of methods for uncovering typical trajectories and relating them to precursors and later outcomes exists. However, despite their increasing use, no practical overview of these methods targeted at epidemiological applications exists. Hence we provide: (a) a review of the three most commonly used methods for the identification of latent trajectories (growth mixture models, latent class growth analysis, and longitudinal latent class analysis); and (b) recommendations for the identification and interpretation of these trajectories and of their relationship with other variables. For illustration, we use longitudinal data on childhood body mass index and parental reports of fussy eating, collected in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.
AB - Individual-level longitudinal data on biological, behavioural, and social dimensions are becoming increasingly available. Typically, these data are analysed using mixed effects models, with the result summarised in terms of an average trajectory plus measures of the individual variations around this average. However, public health investigations would benefit from finer modelling of these individual variations which identify not just one average trajectory, but several typical trajectories. If evidence of heterogeneity in the development of these variables is found, the role played by temporally preceding (explanatory) variables as well as the potential impact of differential trajectories may have on later outcomes is often of interest. A wide choice of methods for uncovering typical trajectories and relating them to precursors and later outcomes exists. However, despite their increasing use, no practical overview of these methods targeted at epidemiological applications exists. Hence we provide: (a) a review of the three most commonly used methods for the identification of latent trajectories (growth mixture models, latent class growth analysis, and longitudinal latent class analysis); and (b) recommendations for the identification and interpretation of these trajectories and of their relationship with other variables. For illustration, we use longitudinal data on childhood body mass index and parental reports of fussy eating, collected in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.
KW - ALSPAC
KW - Growth mixture models
KW - Latent class growth analysis
KW - Longitudinal latent class analysis
KW - Mixed effects models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081570418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10654-020-00615-6
DO - 10.1007/s10654-020-00615-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 32140937
AN - SCOPUS:85081570418
SN - 0393-2990
VL - 35
SP - 205
EP - 222
JO - European Journal of Epidemiology
JF - European Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 3
ER -