TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying typical trajectories in longitudinal data
T2 - modelling strategies and interpretations
AU - Herle, Moritz
AU - Micali, Nadia
AU - Abdulkadir, Mohamed
AU - Loos, Ruth
AU - Bryant-Waugh, Rachel
AU - Hübel, Christopher
AU - Bulik, Cynthia M.
AU - De Stavola, Bianca L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them, and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists, and nurses. All research at Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health is made possible by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
This work was specifically funded by the UK Medical Research Council and the Medical Research Foundation (Ref: MR/R004803/1). The UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant Ref: 102215/2/13/2) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website. Dr Santos Ferreira works in a Unit that receives funds from the University of Bristol and the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/6). Prof Bulik acknowledges funding from the Swedish Research Council (VR Dnr: 538-2013-8864), National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH109528) and the Klarman Family Foundation. Dr Micali and Prof Bulik report funding form National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH115397). Acknowledgements
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Individual-level longitudinal data on biological, behavioural, and social dimensions are becoming increasingly available. Typically, these data are analysed using mixed effects models, with the result summarised in terms of an average trajectory plus measures of the individual variations around this average. However, public health investigations would benefit from finer modelling of these individual variations which identify not just one average trajectory, but several typical trajectories. If evidence of heterogeneity in the development of these variables is found, the role played by temporally preceding (explanatory) variables as well as the potential impact of differential trajectories may have on later outcomes is often of interest. A wide choice of methods for uncovering typical trajectories and relating them to precursors and later outcomes exists. However, despite their increasing use, no practical overview of these methods targeted at epidemiological applications exists. Hence we provide: (a) a review of the three most commonly used methods for the identification of latent trajectories (growth mixture models, latent class growth analysis, and longitudinal latent class analysis); and (b) recommendations for the identification and interpretation of these trajectories and of their relationship with other variables. For illustration, we use longitudinal data on childhood body mass index and parental reports of fussy eating, collected in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.
AB - Individual-level longitudinal data on biological, behavioural, and social dimensions are becoming increasingly available. Typically, these data are analysed using mixed effects models, with the result summarised in terms of an average trajectory plus measures of the individual variations around this average. However, public health investigations would benefit from finer modelling of these individual variations which identify not just one average trajectory, but several typical trajectories. If evidence of heterogeneity in the development of these variables is found, the role played by temporally preceding (explanatory) variables as well as the potential impact of differential trajectories may have on later outcomes is often of interest. A wide choice of methods for uncovering typical trajectories and relating them to precursors and later outcomes exists. However, despite their increasing use, no practical overview of these methods targeted at epidemiological applications exists. Hence we provide: (a) a review of the three most commonly used methods for the identification of latent trajectories (growth mixture models, latent class growth analysis, and longitudinal latent class analysis); and (b) recommendations for the identification and interpretation of these trajectories and of their relationship with other variables. For illustration, we use longitudinal data on childhood body mass index and parental reports of fussy eating, collected in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.
KW - ALSPAC
KW - Growth mixture models
KW - Latent class growth analysis
KW - Longitudinal latent class analysis
KW - Mixed effects models
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081570418&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10654-020-00615-6
DO - 10.1007/s10654-020-00615-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 32140937
AN - SCOPUS:85081570418
SN - 0393-2990
VL - 35
SP - 205
EP - 222
JO - European Journal of Epidemiology
JF - European Journal of Epidemiology
IS - 3
ER -