TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of iPhone and iPad applications for obstetrics and gynecology providers
AU - Farag, Sara
AU - Chyjek, Kathy
AU - Chen, Katherine T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify the number of applications ("apps") compatible with the iPhone and the iPad that are potentially useful to obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: Obstetrics and gynecology MeSH terms were searched in the Apple iTunes Store. A master list of unique apps was created and the apps were divided into categories and subcategories. RESULTS: A total of 1,816 unique apps using 55 different obstetrics and gynecology MeSH terms were found. Of these unique apps, 242 apps (13.3%) were considered potentially useful to ob-gyns. The MeSH terms that yielded the highest number of potentially useful apps were "gynecology" (23%), "breast cancer" (17%), "obstetrics" (14%), and "pregnancy" (12%). CONCLUSION: Less than 15% of apps found were considered potentially useful to ob-gyns. Thus, the obstetrics and gynecology community is in need of an organized effort to identify, review, and determine the accuracy of apps that can potentially improve the performance of health care providers and lead to better patient outcomes. We propose the formation of a committee to guide in this important task.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify the number of applications ("apps") compatible with the iPhone and the iPad that are potentially useful to obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns). METHODS: Obstetrics and gynecology MeSH terms were searched in the Apple iTunes Store. A master list of unique apps was created and the apps were divided into categories and subcategories. RESULTS: A total of 1,816 unique apps using 55 different obstetrics and gynecology MeSH terms were found. Of these unique apps, 242 apps (13.3%) were considered potentially useful to ob-gyns. The MeSH terms that yielded the highest number of potentially useful apps were "gynecology" (23%), "breast cancer" (17%), "obstetrics" (14%), and "pregnancy" (12%). CONCLUSION: Less than 15% of apps found were considered potentially useful to ob-gyns. Thus, the obstetrics and gynecology community is in need of an organized effort to identify, review, and determine the accuracy of apps that can potentially improve the performance of health care providers and lead to better patient outcomes. We propose the formation of a committee to guide in this important task.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925449867&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000510
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000510
M3 - Article
C2 - 25437722
AN - SCOPUS:84925449867
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 124
SP - 941
EP - 945
JO - Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 5
ER -