Hypopharyngeal Perforation Near-Miss during Transesophageal Echocardiography

Jonathan E. Aviv, Marco R. Di Tullio, Shunichi Homma, Ian S. Storper, Anne Zschommler, Guoguang Ma, Eva Petkova, Mark Murphy, Rosemary Desloge, Gary Shaw, Stanley Benjamin, Steven Corwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: The traditional blind passage of a transesophageal echocardiography probe transorally through the hypopharynx is considered safe. Yet, severe hypopharyngeal complications during transesophageal echocardiography at several institutions led the authors to investigate whether traditional probe passage results in a greater incidence of hypopharyngeal injuries when compared with probe passage under direct visualization. Study Design: Randomized, prospective clinical study. Methods: In 159 consciously sedated adults referred for transesophageal echocardiography, the authors performed transesophageal echocardiography with concomitant transnasal video-endoscopic monitoring of the hypopharynx. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive traditional (blind) or experimental (optical) transesophageal echocardiography. The primary outcome measure was frequency of hypopharyngeal injuries (hypopharyngeal lacerations or hematomas), and the secondary outcome measure was number of hypopharyngeal contacts. Results: No perforation occurred with either technique. However, hypopharyngeal lacerations or hematomas occurred in 19 of 80 (23.8%) patients with the traditional technique (11 superficial lacerations of pyriform sinus, 1 laceration of pharynx, 12 arytenoid hematomas, 2 vocal fold hematomas, and 1 pyriform hematoma) and in 1 of 79 patients (1.3%) with the optical technique (superficial pyriform laceration) (P = .001). All traumatized patients underwent flexible laryngoscopy, but none required additional intervention. Respectively, hypopharyngeal contacts were more frequent with the traditional than with the optical technique at the pyriform sinus (70.0% vs. 10.1% [P = .001]), arytenoid (55.0% vs. 3.8% [P = .001]), and vocal fold (15.0% vs. 3.86% [P = .016]). Conclusion: Optically guided transesophageal echocardiography results in significantly fewer hypopharyngeal injuries and fewer contacts than traditional, blind transesophageal echocardiography. The optically guided technique may result in decreased frequency of potentially significant complications and therefore in improved patient safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)821-826
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume114
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Endoscopy
  • Hypopharyngeal injury
  • Hypopharynx
  • Patient safety
  • Transesophageal echocardiography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypopharyngeal Perforation Near-Miss during Transesophageal Echocardiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this