Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process

Lee E. Turpin; Robert S. Henderson; Herbert W. Wizig; Richard Foley; Gerald D. Lamb; Ennio L. Mastracci; Charles Radcliffe; Terry R. Waldron; Eugene Roundtree; Brian Rasbold; J. B. Roddey; Michael J. Zetlmeisl; Brian M. Moyse; Aristides Macris; Alain P. Lamourelle; Don MacAhan; Raj Patel; Lloyd Winger; Peter G. Andrews; Terry A. Reid; James D. Weith; John Traeger; David Forester; Claude Brun; Stephen Lin; Tariq Malik; Mehmet Y. Asim; Terrence S. Higgins; Arthur R. Gentry; Ben Grieb; Varut Komalarajun; Benjamin Klein; Paul W. Vance

Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process

Lee E. Turpin, Robert S. Henderson, Herbert W. Wizig, Richard Foley, Gerald D. Lamb, Ennio L. Mastracci, Charles Radcliffe, Terry R. Waldron, Eugene Roundtree, Brian Rasbold, J. B. Roddey, Michael J. Zetlmeisl, Brian M. Moyse, Aristides Macris, Alain P. Lamourelle, Don MacAhan, Raj Patel, Lloyd Winger, Peter G. Andrews, Terry A. ReidJames D. Weith, John Traeger, David Forester, Claude Brun, Stephen Lin, Tariq Malik, Mehmet Y. Asim, Terrence S. Higgins, Arthur R. Gentry, Ben Grieb, Varut Komalarajun, Benjamin Klein, Paul W. Vance

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

A session on hydrogen processing, presented at the 1998 NPRA Question and Answer Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology, Washington, DC, covers process variables in hydrotreating coker naphthas; selective desulfurization of FCC naphtha with minimal octane loss; MTBE and/or TAME in purchased naphthas; impact of chloride carryover on a hydroprocessing unit; impact of unit hydrogen partial pressure on the choice of catalyst type when producing future European diesel; changing diesel hydrotreater product sulfur from 500 to 50 wt ppm in an existing unit; running a ramped temperature profile operation in a hydrotreating unit; comparison between FCC feed hydrotreating vs. FCC naphtha hydrotreating for reducing gasoline pool sulfur; FCC yield improvements realized by increasing the severity of the hydrotreating operation; comparison between ex situ and in situ presulfiding methods; product quality problems; hydrocracking heavy feeds; techniques to combat high radial temperature spreads in hydrotreater or hydrocracker catalyst beds; parameters determining the optimum reactor pressure; monitoring water quality used for washing reactor effluent heat exchangers; operating parallel hydrotreaters with different feeds and operating objectives in each train; hydroprocessing wide boiling range feeds; and alternative routes to conventional hydroprocessing.

Original language	English
State	Published - 2000
Externally published	Yes

Cite this

@conference{c950bb8a2b65401bb7f62fd8536a727d,

title = "Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process",

abstract = "A session on hydrogen processing, presented at the 1998 NPRA Question and Answer Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology, Washington, DC, covers process variables in hydrotreating coker naphthas; selective desulfurization of FCC naphtha with minimal octane loss; MTBE and/or TAME in purchased naphthas; impact of chloride carryover on a hydroprocessing unit; impact of unit hydrogen partial pressure on the choice of catalyst type when producing future European diesel; changing diesel hydrotreater product sulfur from 500 to 50 wt ppm in an existing unit; running a ramped temperature profile operation in a hydrotreating unit; comparison between FCC feed hydrotreating vs. FCC naphtha hydrotreating for reducing gasoline pool sulfur; FCC yield improvements realized by increasing the severity of the hydrotreating operation; comparison between ex situ and in situ presulfiding methods; product quality problems; hydrocracking heavy feeds; techniques to combat high radial temperature spreads in hydrotreater or hydrocracker catalyst beds; parameters determining the optimum reactor pressure; monitoring water quality used for washing reactor effluent heat exchangers; operating parallel hydrotreaters with different feeds and operating objectives in each train; hydroprocessing wide boiling range feeds; and alternative routes to conventional hydroprocessing.",

author = "Turpin, {Lee E.} and Henderson, {Robert S.} and Wizig, {Herbert W.} and Richard Foley and Lamb, {Gerald D.} and Mastracci, {Ennio L.} and Charles Radcliffe and Waldron, {Terry R.} and Eugene Roundtree and Brian Rasbold and Roddey, {J. B.} and Zetlmeisl, {Michael J.} and Moyse, {Brian M.} and Aristides Macris and Lamourelle, {Alain P.} and Don MacAhan and Raj Patel and Lloyd Winger and Andrews, {Peter G.} and Reid, {Terry A.} and Weith, {James D.} and John Traeger and David Forester and Claude Brun and Stephen Lin and Tariq Malik and Asim, {Mehmet Y.} and Higgins, {Terrence S.} and Gentry, {Arthur R.} and Ben Grieb and Varut Komalarajun and Benjamin Klein and Vance, {Paul W.}",

year = "2000",

language = "English",

}

Turpin, LE, Henderson, RS, Wizig, HW, Foley, R, Lamb, GD, Mastracci, EL, Radcliffe, C, Waldron, TR, Roundtree, E, Rasbold, B, Roddey, JB, Zetlmeisl, MJ, Moyse, BM, Macris, A, Lamourelle, AP, MacAhan, D, Patel, R, Winger, L, Andrews, PG, Reid, TA, Weith, JD, Traeger, J, Forester, D, Brun, C, Lin, S, Malik, T, Asim, MY, Higgins, TS, Gentry, AR, Grieb, B, Komalarajun, V, Klein, B & Vance, PW 2000, 'Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process'.

TY - CONF

T1 - Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process

AU - Turpin, Lee E.

AU - Henderson, Robert S.

AU - Wizig, Herbert W.

AU - Foley, Richard

AU - Lamb, Gerald D.

AU - Mastracci, Ennio L.

AU - Radcliffe, Charles

AU - Waldron, Terry R.

AU - Roundtree, Eugene

AU - Rasbold, Brian

AU - Roddey, J. B.

AU - Zetlmeisl, Michael J.

AU - Moyse, Brian M.

AU - Macris, Aristides

AU - Lamourelle, Alain P.

AU - MacAhan, Don

AU - Patel, Raj

AU - Winger, Lloyd

AU - Andrews, Peter G.

AU - Reid, Terry A.

AU - Weith, James D.

AU - Traeger, John

AU - Forester, David

AU - Brun, Claude

AU - Lin, Stephen

AU - Malik, Tariq

AU - Asim, Mehmet Y.

AU - Higgins, Terrence S.

AU - Gentry, Arthur R.

AU - Grieb, Ben

AU - Komalarajun, Varut

AU - Klein, Benjamin

AU - Vance, Paul W.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - A session on hydrogen processing, presented at the 1998 NPRA Question and Answer Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology, Washington, DC, covers process variables in hydrotreating coker naphthas; selective desulfurization of FCC naphtha with minimal octane loss; MTBE and/or TAME in purchased naphthas; impact of chloride carryover on a hydroprocessing unit; impact of unit hydrogen partial pressure on the choice of catalyst type when producing future European diesel; changing diesel hydrotreater product sulfur from 500 to 50 wt ppm in an existing unit; running a ramped temperature profile operation in a hydrotreating unit; comparison between FCC feed hydrotreating vs. FCC naphtha hydrotreating for reducing gasoline pool sulfur; FCC yield improvements realized by increasing the severity of the hydrotreating operation; comparison between ex situ and in situ presulfiding methods; product quality problems; hydrocracking heavy feeds; techniques to combat high radial temperature spreads in hydrotreater or hydrocracker catalyst beds; parameters determining the optimum reactor pressure; monitoring water quality used for washing reactor effluent heat exchangers; operating parallel hydrotreaters with different feeds and operating objectives in each train; hydroprocessing wide boiling range feeds; and alternative routes to conventional hydroprocessing.

AB - A session on hydrogen processing, presented at the 1998 NPRA Question and Answer Session on Refining and Petrochemical Technology, Washington, DC, covers process variables in hydrotreating coker naphthas; selective desulfurization of FCC naphtha with minimal octane loss; MTBE and/or TAME in purchased naphthas; impact of chloride carryover on a hydroprocessing unit; impact of unit hydrogen partial pressure on the choice of catalyst type when producing future European diesel; changing diesel hydrotreater product sulfur from 500 to 50 wt ppm in an existing unit; running a ramped temperature profile operation in a hydrotreating unit; comparison between FCC feed hydrotreating vs. FCC naphtha hydrotreating for reducing gasoline pool sulfur; FCC yield improvements realized by increasing the severity of the hydrotreating operation; comparison between ex situ and in situ presulfiding methods; product quality problems; hydrocracking heavy feeds; techniques to combat high radial temperature spreads in hydrotreater or hydrocracker catalyst beds; parameters determining the optimum reactor pressure; monitoring water quality used for washing reactor effluent heat exchangers; operating parallel hydrotreaters with different feeds and operating objectives in each train; hydroprocessing wide boiling range feeds; and alternative routes to conventional hydroprocessing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942470494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

AN - SCOPUS:1942470494

ER -

Hydrogen processing. Hydroprocessing. Process

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this