Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA level and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points: A meta-analysis

  • A. Babiker
  • , J. Bartlett
  • , A. Breckenridge
  • , G. Collins
  • , R. Coombs
  • , D. Cooper
  • , T. Creagh
  • , A. Cross
  • , M. Daniels
  • , J. Darbyshire
  • , D. Dawson
  • , V. DeGruttola
  • , R. DeMasi
  • , R. Dolin
  • , J. Eron
  • , M. Fischl
  • , S. Grossberg
  • , J. Hamilton
  • , S. Hammer
  • , P. Hartigan
  • K. Henry, A. Hill, M. Hughes, J. Kahn, C. Katlama, D. Katzenstein, S. Kim, D. Mildvan, J. Montaner, M. Moore, J. Neaton, W. O'Brien, H. Ribaudo, D. Richman, M. Saag, M. Salgo, L. Saravolatz, R. Schooley, M. Seligmann, S. Staszewski, L. Struthers, C. Tierney, A. Tsiatis, S. Welles, M. D. Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate treatment-mediated changes in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points for disease progression (AIDS/death). Methods: Data from 13,045 subjects in all 16 randomized trials comparing nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and having HIV-1 RNA measurements at 24 weeks were obtained. A total of 3146 subjects had HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count determinations at 24 weeks after starting treatment. Results: At Week 24, the percentage of subjects experiencing an HIV-1 RNA decrease of >1 log10 copies/ml or a CD4 count increase of >33% was similar (22% vs 25%). Changes in both markers at Week 24 were significant independent predictors of AIDS/death: Across trials, the average reduction in hazard was 51% per 1 log10 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml decrease (95% confidence interval: 41%, 59%) and 20% per 33% CD4 count increase (17%, 24%). In univariate analyses, the hazard ratio for AIDS/death in randomized treatment comparisons was significantly associated with differences between treatments in mean area under the curve of HIV-1 RNA changes to Weeks 8 and 24 (AUCMB) and mean CD4 change at Week 24, but, in multivariate analysis, only mean CD4 change was significant. Conclusions: Change in HIV-1 RNA, particularly using AUCMB, and in CD4 count should be measured to aid patient management and evaluation of treatment activity in clinical trials. However, short-term changes in these markers are imperfect as surrogate end points for long-term clinical outcome because two randomized treatment comparisons may show similar differences between treatments in marker changes but not similar differences in progression to AIDS/death.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1123-1133
Number of pages11
JournalAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Volume16
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 10 Aug 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA level and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points: A meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this