Abstract
Policy makers generally agree that childhood obesity is a national problem. However, it is not always clear whether enough is being spent to combat it. This paper presents nine scenarios that assume three different degrees of reduction in obesity/overweight rates among children in three age groups. A mathematical model was then used to project lifetime health and economic gains. Spending $2 billion a year would be cost-effective if it reduced obesity among twelve-year-olds by one percentage point. The analysis also found that childhood obesity has more profound economic consequences than previously documented. Large investments to reduce this major contributor to adult disability may thus be cost-effective by widely accepted criteria.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 372-378 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Health Affairs |
Volume | 29 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2010 |