Homozygosity for pericentric inversions of chromosome 9: Prenatal diagnosis of two cases

P. D. Cotter, A. Babu, L. D. McCurdy, M. Caggana, J. P. Willner, R. J. Desnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

The finding of homozygosity for a pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 [inv(9)] is rare, and previously has not been reported at prenatal diagnosis. We describe two unrelated cases of homozygosity for inv(9) identified in amniocytes. In each case, both parents were heterozygotes for the inv(9); 46,XX,inv(9)(p11q13) and 46,XY,inv(9) (p11q13). Case 1 resulted in a normal term infant who at age 5 years was phenotypically and developmentally normal. Case 2 was referred for severe intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and oligohydramnios, and subsequently expired in utero. Even though inv(9) is a normal chromosome variant with a frequency of 1 to 3% in the general population, the finding of homozygosity for inv(9) and IUGR in this fetus suggested the possibility of uniparental disomy (UPD). Molecular studies confirmed the presence of both parental inv(9) chromosomes, excluding the possibility of chromosome 9 UPD as the cause of IUGR in this fetus. Presumably, inv(9) homozygosity results from the high frequency of inv(9) heterozygosity, and is a normal variant. However, until the effects of UPD for chromosome 9 are established parental karyotypes and, where appropriate, molecular studies should be performed to exclude UPD. In addition, more reports of inv(9) homozygosity detected prenatally are needed to assess its frequency and outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-226
Number of pages5
JournalAnnales de Genetique
Volume40
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Amniocentesis
  • Chromosome 9
  • Chromosome variant
  • Intrauterine growth retardation
  • Pericentric inversion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Homozygosity for pericentric inversions of chromosome 9: Prenatal diagnosis of two cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this