Histochemical analyses of steroid hormone receptors in breast and prostatic carcinoma

L. P. Pertschuk, E. H. Tobin, P. Tanapat, E. Gaetjens, A. C. Carter, N. D. Bloom, R. J. Macchia, K. B. Eisenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

Histochemical analyses for estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors in breast cancer were statistically correlated with results of dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) and sucrose gradient assys. Correlation for ER was 91% of 363 cases, and for PgR 88% of 225 specimens. Breast cancer ER/PgR positivity by histochemistry correlated with a favorable clinical response to endocrine therapies in 72% of 25 cases, while ER/PgR negativity correlated with a lack of response in 96% of 22 cases with Stage IV disease. Nuclear ER/PgR correlated with a poor response to therapy in 8 and 12 patients. An in vitro technique to detect nuclear translocation of ER revealed two groups of ER positive cases, with 11 of 17 exhibiting translocation and 6 not displaying translocation. In positive carcinoma, 72% of 65 were positive for ER and/or androgen receptor. Comparison of specimens obtained without and with electrocautery revealed a preponderance of nuclear binding in the latter, suggesting heat-induced nuclear translocation of receptor. Coumestrol, a naturally fluorescent, entirely unaltered estrogen was also used for histochemical dectection of ER. Results correlated with ER by DCC in 87% of 61 breast cancers. Coumestrol was additionally used to visually observe receptor and nuclear translocation of ER in intact whole cells in culture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-810
Number of pages12
JournalUnknown Journal
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Histochemical analyses of steroid hormone receptors in breast and prostatic carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this