Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning

K. Henriksen, H. Kaplan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

178 Scopus citations

Abstract

The ubiquitous nature of hindsight bias is a cause for concern for those engaged in investigations and retrospective analysis of medical error. Hindsight does not equal foresight. Investigations that are anchored to outcome knowledge run the risk of not capturing the complexities and uncertainties facing sharp end personnel and why their actions made sense at the time. Important lessons go unlearned if the exercise is simply to back track someone else's decision landmarks. Outcome knowledge can also bias our thinking on the quality of the processes that led to the outcome. This paper examines the influence of outcome knowledge in relation to reconstructive memory and legal testimony, ways for reducing the impact of outcome knowledge, and an adaptive learning framework that places hindsight bias in a broader context of rapid updating of knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)ii46-ii50
JournalQuality and Safety in Health Care
Volume12
Issue numberSUPPL. 2
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this