High Correspondence Between Child Behavior Checklist Rule Breaking Behavior Scale with Conduct Disorder in Males and Females

Amy M. Yule, Maura DiSalvo, Timothy E. Wilens, Janet Wozniak, Stephen V. Faraone, Rachael M. Lyons, K. Yvonne Woodworth, Joseph Biederman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigated the diagnostic utility of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Rule-Breaking Behavior scale to identify children of both sexes with conduct disorder (CD). Participants were derived from four independent datasets of children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar-I disorder of both sexes. Participants had structured diagnostic interviews with raters blinded to subject ascertainment status. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to examine the scale’s ability to identify children with and without CD. The sample consisted of 674 participants (mean age of 11.7 ± 3.3 years, 57% male, 94% Caucasian). The interaction to test if CBCL Rule-Breaking Behavior scores identified males and females with CD differently was not significant, thus we performed ROC analysis in the combined group. The ROC analysis of the scale yielded an area under the curve of 0.9. A score of ≥ 60 on the scale correctly classified 82% of participants with CD with 85% sensitivity, 81% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, 96% negative predictive value. The CBCL Rule-Breaking Behavior scale was an efficient tool to identify children with CD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)978-985
Number of pages8
JournalChild Psychiatry and Human Development
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Child behavior checklist (CBCL)
  • Children
  • Conduct disorder
  • Rule breaking behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High Correspondence Between Child Behavior Checklist Rule Breaking Behavior Scale with Conduct Disorder in Males and Females'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this