TY - JOUR
T1 - Hemodynamic response to fluid removal during hemodialysis
T2 - categorization of causes of intradialytic hypotension
AU - Levin, Nathan W.
AU - de Abreu, Marcia H.F.G.
AU - Borges, Lucas E.
AU - Tavares Filho, Helcio A.
AU - Sarwar, Rabia
AU - Gupta, Surendra
AU - Hafeez, Tahir
AU - Lev, Shaul
AU - Williams, Caroline
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background: Intradialytic hypotension is a clinically significant problem, however, the hemodynamics that underlie ultrafiltration and consequent hypotensive episodes has not been studied comprehensively. Methods: Intradialytic cardiac output, cardiac power and peripheral resistance changes from pretreatment measurements were evaluated using a novel regional impedance cardiographic device (NICaS, NI Medical, Peta Tikva, Israel) in 263 hemodialysis sessions in 54 patients in dialysis units in the USA and Brazil with the goal of determining the various hemodynamic trends as blood pressure decreases. Results: Hypotensive episodes occurred in 99 (13.5%) of 736 intra- and postdialytic evaluations. The hemodynamic profiles of the episodes were categorized: (i) The cardiac power index significantly decreased in 35% of episodes by 36%, from 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.72] to 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.48) [w/m2] with a small reduction in the total peripheral resistance index. (ii) The total peripheral resistance index significantly decreased in 37.4% of episodes by 33%, from 3342 (95% CI 2824-3859) to 2251 (95% CI 1900-2602) [dyn × s/cm5 × m2] with a small reduction in the cardiac power index. (iii) Both the cardiac power index and total peripheral resistance index significantly decreased in 27.3% of episodes, the cardiac power index by 25% from 0.63 (95% CI 0.57-0.70) to 0.48 (95% CI 0.42-0.53) [w/m2] and the total peripheral resistance index by 23% from 2964 (95% CI 2428-3501) to 2266 (95% CI 1891-2642). Conclusions: The hemodynamic profiles clearly define specific hemodynamic mechanisms of cardiac power reduction and/or vasodilatation as underlying intradialytic hypotensive episodes. A reduction in cardiac power (reduction of both blood pressure and cardiac output) could be the result of preload reduction due to a high ultrafiltration rate with not enough refilling or low target weight. A reduction in peripheral resistance (reduction in blood pressure and increase in cardiac output) could be the result of relative vasodilatation as arteries do not contract to compensate for volume reduction due to autonomous dysfunction. As both phenomena are independent, they may appear at the same time. Based on these results, a reduction of ultrafiltration rate and an increase in target weight to improve preload or immediate therapeutic actions to increase peripheral resistance are rational measures that could be taken to maintain blood pressure and prevent hypotensive ischemic complications in dialysis patients.
AB - Background: Intradialytic hypotension is a clinically significant problem, however, the hemodynamics that underlie ultrafiltration and consequent hypotensive episodes has not been studied comprehensively. Methods: Intradialytic cardiac output, cardiac power and peripheral resistance changes from pretreatment measurements were evaluated using a novel regional impedance cardiographic device (NICaS, NI Medical, Peta Tikva, Israel) in 263 hemodialysis sessions in 54 patients in dialysis units in the USA and Brazil with the goal of determining the various hemodynamic trends as blood pressure decreases. Results: Hypotensive episodes occurred in 99 (13.5%) of 736 intra- and postdialytic evaluations. The hemodynamic profiles of the episodes were categorized: (i) The cardiac power index significantly decreased in 35% of episodes by 36%, from 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.72] to 0.43 (95% CI 0.37-0.48) [w/m2] with a small reduction in the total peripheral resistance index. (ii) The total peripheral resistance index significantly decreased in 37.4% of episodes by 33%, from 3342 (95% CI 2824-3859) to 2251 (95% CI 1900-2602) [dyn × s/cm5 × m2] with a small reduction in the cardiac power index. (iii) Both the cardiac power index and total peripheral resistance index significantly decreased in 27.3% of episodes, the cardiac power index by 25% from 0.63 (95% CI 0.57-0.70) to 0.48 (95% CI 0.42-0.53) [w/m2] and the total peripheral resistance index by 23% from 2964 (95% CI 2428-3501) to 2266 (95% CI 1891-2642). Conclusions: The hemodynamic profiles clearly define specific hemodynamic mechanisms of cardiac power reduction and/or vasodilatation as underlying intradialytic hypotensive episodes. A reduction in cardiac power (reduction of both blood pressure and cardiac output) could be the result of preload reduction due to a high ultrafiltration rate with not enough refilling or low target weight. A reduction in peripheral resistance (reduction in blood pressure and increase in cardiac output) could be the result of relative vasodilatation as arteries do not contract to compensate for volume reduction due to autonomous dysfunction. As both phenomena are independent, they may appear at the same time. Based on these results, a reduction of ultrafiltration rate and an increase in target weight to improve preload or immediate therapeutic actions to increase peripheral resistance are rational measures that could be taken to maintain blood pressure and prevent hypotensive ischemic complications in dialysis patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056088521&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ndt/gfy048
DO - 10.1093/ndt/gfy048
M3 - Article
C2 - 29669016
AN - SCOPUS:85056088521
SN - 0931-0509
VL - 33
SP - 1643
EP - 1649
JO - Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
JF - Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
IS - 9
ER -