Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: Assessment of economic outcome

  • Zoher Ghogawala
  • , Robert G. Whitmore
  • , William C. Watters
  • , Alok Sharan
  • , Praveen V. Mummaneni
  • , Andrew T. Dailey
  • , Tanvir F. Choudhri
  • , Jason C. Eck
  • , Michael W. Groff
  • , Jeffrey C. Wang
  • , Daniel K. Resnick
  • , Sanjay S. Dhall
  • , Michael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comprehensive economic analysis generally involves the calculation of indirect and direct health costs from a societal perspective as opposed to simply reporting costs from a hospital or payer perspective. Hospital charges for a surgical procedure must be converted to cost data when performing a cost-effectiveness analysis. Once cost data has been calculated, quality-adjusted life year data from a surgical treatment are calculated by using a preference-based health-related quality-of-life instrument such as the EQ-5D. A recent cost-utility analysis from a single study has demonstrated the long-term (over an 8-year time period) benefits of circumferential fusions over stand-alone posterolateral fusions. In addition, economic analysis from a single study has found that lumbar fusion for selected patients with low-back pain can be recommended from an economic perspective. Recent economic analysis, from a single study, finds that femoral ring allograft might be more cost-effective compared with a specific titanium cage when performing an anterior lumbar interbody fusion plus posterolateral fusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-22
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Outcomes
  • Practice guidelines

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 3: Assessment of economic outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this