Abstract
Background: New portable ultrasound (US) systems are capable of detecting fractures in the remote setting. However, the accuracy of ultrasound by physicians with minimal ultrasound training is unknown. Methods: After one hour of standardized training, physicians with minimal US experience clinically evaluated patients presenting with pain and trauma to the upper arm or leg. The investigators then performed a long-bone US evaluation, recording their impression of fracture presence or absence. Results of the examination were compared with routine plain or computer aided radiography (CT). Results: 58 patients were examined. The sensitivity and specificity of US were 92.9% and 83.3%, and of the physical examination were 78.6% and 90.0%, respectively. US provided improved sensitivity with less specificity compared with physical examination in the detection of fractures in long bones. Conclusion: Ultrasound scans by minimally trained clinicians may be used to rule out a long-bone fracture in patients with a medium to low probability of fracture.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 329-332 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2004 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Femur
- Fractures
- Humerus
- Ultrasound
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Goal-directed ultrasound in the detection of long-bone fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver