Geriatric Education Part I: Efficacy of a Mandatory Clinical Rotation for Fourth Year Medical Students

Suzanne D. Fields, Rajendra Jutagir, Ronald D. Adelman, Rein Tideiksarr, Ellen Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

To describe the curriculum of a mandatory, fourth‐year geriatrics clerkship and assess its impact on medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine and attitudes toward the elderly. One group, before/after trial. Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York. Entire fourth year class of medical students (n = 127). Four‐week‐long clinical geriatrics clerkship. Pre‐ and post‐rotation: test of knowledge; Aging Semantic Differential (ASD) attitude scale; Modified Maxwell‐Sullivan attitude scale; questionnaire. Seventy percent of students found the rotation to be educationally valuable; however, only one‐third of students would have taken the clerkship had it not been required. Mean geriatric knowledge score increased by 18.7% (P < 0.001). Mean ASD attitude score did not change significantly (130.5 ± 19.2 pre‐rotation versus 126.6 ± 18.8 post‐rotation, P = 0.15), but students started the rotation with a neutral attitude. Over 90% of students agreed they would welcome elderly into their future practice. If a national curricular goal is to improve medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine, required rather than elective rotations may be in order.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)964-969
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume40
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Geriatric Education Part I: Efficacy of a Mandatory Clinical Rotation for Fourth Year Medical Students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this