TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographic variations in sperm counts
T2 - A potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality
AU - Fisch, H.
AU - Goluboff, E. T.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Objective: To determine whether geographic variations in sperm counts might bias conclusions drawn from studies of semen quality. Design: Reanalysis of published data from a meta-analysis of 61 studies from 1938 to 1990 that concluded a worldwide decline in semen quality over the last 50 years. Main Outcome Measures: Influence of geographic location on sperm counts. Results: Of 61 studies in the meta-analysis, only 20 included ≥100 men. These 20 studies collectively comprised 91% of the total men studied. We focused our reanalysis on these 20 studies. Of the studies before 1970, all were from the United States and 80% were from New York. These studies represented locations with the highest sperm counts. In contrast, after 1970, 80% of the studies were from locations not represented earlier, including five studies from third world countries, where sperm counts were low. Conclusions: Sperm counts vary dramatically among different geographic locations. Geographic variations in sperm counts need to be considered when analyzing data from different locations.
AB - Objective: To determine whether geographic variations in sperm counts might bias conclusions drawn from studies of semen quality. Design: Reanalysis of published data from a meta-analysis of 61 studies from 1938 to 1990 that concluded a worldwide decline in semen quality over the last 50 years. Main Outcome Measures: Influence of geographic location on sperm counts. Results: Of 61 studies in the meta-analysis, only 20 included ≥100 men. These 20 studies collectively comprised 91% of the total men studied. We focused our reanalysis on these 20 studies. Of the studies before 1970, all were from the United States and 80% were from New York. These studies represented locations with the highest sperm counts. In contrast, after 1970, 80% of the studies were from locations not represented earlier, including five studies from third world countries, where sperm counts were low. Conclusions: Sperm counts vary dramatically among different geographic locations. Geographic variations in sperm counts need to be considered when analyzing data from different locations.
KW - Sperm counts
KW - geographic variation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0029919777
U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58284-3
DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58284-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 8612832
AN - SCOPUS:0029919777
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 65
SP - 1044
EP - 1046
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 5
ER -